行贿犯罪所获间接经济利益的追缴研究——以360例行贿犯罪判决案例样本为研究对象

发布时间：2018-03-31 01:27

本文选题：行贿犯罪　切入点：间接经济利益　出处：《河北法学》2017年11期

【摘要】：追缴行贿犯罪所获间接经济利益是目前司法实践中的难题。通过对360例为谋取不正当间接经济利益为目的的行贿犯罪判决案例进行深入研究,结合相关文献报道和司法实践,了解目前司法机关追缴行贿犯罪所获间接经济利益的现状,发现整体追缴率偏低,各个地区对之追缴很不平衡,这极易损害法制统一、司法公正、市场公平竞争,不利于刑罚目的的实现,难以有效遏制该类行贿犯罪。该现象主要是由于违法所得概念与界限不清晰、追缴程序不完善、司法办案人员认识不到位等原因造成的,必须有针对性地采取措施,加强行贿犯罪所获间接经济利益的追缴,确保追缴的合法性、准确性、必然性和全面性,有效地遏制该类犯罪。
[Abstract]:The crime of bribery by recovery of indirect economic benefits is a difficult problem in judicial practice at present. Based on 360 cases of in-depth study for the bribery case judgment for improper indirect economic benefits for the purpose, combining with relevant literature and judicial practice, to understand the present status of judicial organs after the indirect economic benefits granted to pay bribes crime, found that the overall recovery rate is low, the recovery of various regions is very uneven, it is very easy to damage the unity of the legal system, judicial justice, fair competition in the market, is not conducive to the realization of the purpose of punishment, it is difficult to effectively curb the crime of bribery. This phenomenon is mainly due to the illegal income concept and boundaries are not clear, recovery procedure is not perfect, resulting in judicial investigators do not know the place and other reasons, there must be targeted to take measures to strengthen the economic interests of the indirect bribery recovered, ensure the legitimacy of the recovery, accuracy, The inevitability and comprehensiveness of this kind of crime can be effectively prevented.

【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：教育部课题《建构立体形式反腐败体系研究》(13JZD013)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D924.392

【相似文献】