当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

考试作弊犯罪若干问题探究

发布时间:2018-04-04 22:00

  本文选题:替考入刑 切入点:组织考试作弊 出处:《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:21世纪我国社会经济有了极大的发展,人民的生活水平也得以提高,但是我国的素质教育体系却未能及时跟上经济发展的步伐,致使我国社会公民诚信缺失严重,考试作弊行为愈演愈烈。虽然我国新出台的《刑法修正案(九)》规定了考试作弊犯罪,将四类考试作弊的行为类型纳入了刑法规制,但是考试作弊犯罪的适用问题以及相关立法的理论缺陷仍然存在。因此解决考试作弊犯罪的适用问题与弥补考试作弊犯罪的立法缺陷已经成为新法颁布后的当务之急。本文通过四个章节,对考试作弊犯罪中存在的若干问题进行了分析探究。第一章是对考试作弊犯罪的概述,该章分为两节:第一节主要从社会文化、经济利益、评价体系等三个方面揭示了考试作弊犯罪产生的原因;第二节主要阐述了考试作弊犯罪的现状,一方面分析我国考试作弊犯罪的主要特征,另一方面分析我国关于考试作弊犯罪的立法现状以及对古今中外法律的借鉴意义。第二章是针对考试作弊犯罪的适用范围问题的研究,该章分为三节:第一节以刑法理论为主并结合其他相关行政法规及规章多角度探究我国刑法中“国家考试”的范围;第二节以广义和狭义两个法律学说为立论基础,讨论了考试作弊犯罪中“法律规定”这一限定条件所包含的法律范围。第三节结合我国保密法的相关规定对考试作弊犯罪中“试题及答案”的秘密性进行了深层次的分析,探讨了考试作弊相关犯罪适用的时空范围。第三章是对替考入刑争议问题的研究,该章分为两节:第一节对比国外关于替考的相关立法并结合我国不同的学说,辩证分析了我国替考行为所侵犯的具体法益。第二节主要对考试作弊犯罪中关于替考罪的有关规定的合理性进行了比较分析,并提出了相关的意见和建议。、第四章是关于考试作弊犯罪形态与罪数、共犯问题的研究,该章分为两节,第一节是犯罪形态问题的研究,该节对考试作弊犯罪中的部分具体行为类型的既遂标准和中止形态等疑难问题进行了探讨分析;第二节是共犯与罪数问题的研究,该节对考试作弊犯罪中的具体罪名内部以及具体罪名和刑法其他相关罪名的竞合和共犯关系进行了辨析和探讨。
[Abstract]:In the 21st century, the social economy of our country has been greatly developed, and the living standard of the people has also been improved. However, the quality education system of our country has failed to keep up with the pace of economic development in time, resulting in the serious lack of honesty and credit of our country's social citizens.Cheating on exams is getting worse.Although the new Criminal Law Amendment (9) provides for the crime of cheating in examinations and brings the four types of cheating into the criminal law, the application of the crime of cheating in the examination and the theoretical defects of the relevant legislation still exist.Therefore, to solve the problem of the application of the crime of cheating in the examination and to remedy the legislative defects of the crime of cheating in the examination has become an urgent matter after the promulgation of the new law.Through four chapters, this paper analyzes and explores some problems existing in the crime of cheating in examinations.The first chapter is an overview of the crime of cheating in the examination, which is divided into two sections: the first section mainly reveals the reasons for the crime of cheating in the examination from three aspects: social culture, economic interests and evaluation system;The second section mainly elaborated the examination cheating crime present situation, on the one hand analyzed our country examination cheating crime main characteristic, on the other hand analyzed our country regarding the examination cheating crime legislation present situation as well as to the ancient and modern Chinese and foreign laws reference significance.The second chapter is the research on the scope of application of the crime of cheating in examination. This chapter is divided into three sections: the first section mainly focuses on the theory of criminal law and probes into the scope of "national examination" in Chinese criminal law from the angle of other relevant administrative laws and regulations;The second section is based on two legal theories of broad sense and narrow sense, and discusses the legal scope of the limited condition of "legal regulation" in the crime of cheating in examinations.The third section makes a deep analysis of the secrecy of "test questions and answers" in the crime of cheating in the examination in combination with the relevant provisions of the secrecy law of our country, and probes into the space and time scope of the application of the crime related to cheating in the examination.The third chapter is the research on the issue of the disputes over the entry of the double entrance penalty. This chapter is divided into two sections: the first section compares the relevant legislation of foreign countries and combines the different theories of our country, and dialectically analyzes the specific legal interests violated by the act of taking the bench in our country.The second section mainly makes a comparative analysis on the rationality of the relevant provisions of the crime of cheating in the examination, and puts forward the relevant opinions and suggestions. The fourth chapter is about the form and number of the crime of cheating in the examination, and the research on the problem of accomplice.This chapter is divided into two sections, the first section is the study of the form of crime, this section of some of the specific types of cheating in the examination of the completion of the standard and suspension of the form of difficult problems are discussed and analyzed;The second section is the research on the problem of accomplice and the number of crimes. This section distinguishes and discusses the specific charges in the crime of cheating in the examination, as well as the combination of specific charges and other related crimes in criminal law and the relationship between accomplices and accomplices.
【学位授予单位】:深圳大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王才远;;食品监管渎职犯罪新解[J];人民检察;2013年23期

2 石吉洲;略论套汇罪[J];河北法学;1984年03期

3 范祥;;完善“破坏环境资源保护罪”立法问题思考[J];广播电视大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年03期

4 邓小刚;论生产、销售伪劣产品罪[J];湖北大学成人教育学院学报;2001年05期

5 杰;;严惩渎职犯罪维护国家机关正常活动[J];群言;2003年08期

6 ;读者·作者·编者[J];人民司法;1981年12期

7 白雪;论执行判决裁定渎职罪[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2003年03期

8 文姬,余松龄,周国世;论酷刑罪在中国的设立[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2005年02期

9 王延安;;小议“战时”的含义及刑法设置[J];中国商界(下半月);2009年05期

10 陈晓辉;;渎职罪主体问题研究[J];法制与经济(下旬);2010年12期

相关重要报纸文章 前5条

1 严夏晖;应尽快规定刑法修正案(六)法条的具体罪名[N];检察日报;2006年

2 胡伟;刑法条文应规定具体罪名[N];法治快报;2007年

3 华佳   ;解析“行凶”的含义[N];江苏经济报;2012年

4 吴学安;根除伪基站必须动用法治手段[N];法制日报;2014年

5 记者 刘冬梅;从一次性“估算”变“四步量刑”[N];天津日报;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 李宁;论我国刑法中的“暴力”[D];贵州大学;2015年

2 陈群;论我国刑法中的赃物犯罪[D];安徽师范大学;2015年

3 邹龙;考试作弊犯罪若干问题探究[D];深圳大学;2017年

4 罗艳;论生产、销售伪劣产品罪中的“销售金额”[D];湘潭大学;2011年

5 闵凯;空白刑法规范的协调和衔接[D];上海社会科学院;2007年



本文编号:1711864

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1711864.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5d5c9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com