论死缓制度的缺陷及其完善
发布时间:2018-04-13 20:51
本文选题:死缓 + 死刑 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:死刑的废除是现代各国刑罚发展的一大趋势。我国虽然还保留了死刑,但由于实行“保留死刑但限制适用”的死刑政策,死刑立即适用受到了严格限制。限制死刑除了死刑罪名的减少外,还可以通过减少死刑立即的实际执行来完成。我国独创的死刑缓期执行,对限制死刑的立即执行意义重大。死缓作为死刑的一项特殊执行制度,,既保留了执行死刑立即的可能,又限制了死刑立即执行,对我国的刑罚轻缓化的实现具有重要的意义。 然而,我国的死缓制度还存在较多的缺陷,影响了其功能的发挥,这些缺陷主要有:死缓的实体适用条件不明确;死缓转化为死刑立即执行的条件不合理、死缓转化为死刑立即执行的时间不科学;服刑人在矫正过程中的一般立功表现在死缓减刑中没有得到应有的体现、因重大立功而减刑的规定不明、在重大立功和“故意犯罪”并存的情况下存在立法漏洞。 针对这些缺陷,应基于刑罚的正当化理论,结合我国的宽严相济刑事政策,在立法上应更加明确其适用的实体条件,重新设计转化为死刑立即执行的条件,对死缓的减刑制度进行完善等,以更好的发挥其限制死刑立即执行的作用。
[Abstract]:The abolition of death penalty is a trend of penalty development in modern countries.Although China still retains the death penalty, the immediate application of the death penalty is strictly restricted because of the policy of "retaining the death penalty but restricting its application".In addition to the reduction of death penalty charges, the restriction of the death penalty can be accomplished by reducing the actual execution of the death penalty immediately.The original reprieve of death penalty in our country is of great significance to restrict the immediate execution of death penalty.As a special execution system of death penalty, death penalty suspension not only preserves the possibility of executing death penalty immediately, but also restricts the immediate execution of death penalty, which is of great significance to the realization of mild punishment in our country.However, there are still many defects in the system of death-suspension in our country, which affect the exertion of its function. These defects mainly include: the conditions for the application of the suspended death penalty are not clear, and the conditions for the immediate execution of the death penalty are unreasonable.The time when the death penalty is immediately executed is not scientific; the general meritorious service of the prisoners in the correction process is not properly reflected in the commutation of the death sentence, and the provisions for commutation of the sentence due to major meritorious service are not clear.In the case of the coexistence of major meritorious service and intentional crime, there are legislative loopholes.In view of these defects, we should base on the theory of justification of penalty, combine our country's criminal policy of combining leniency and severe punishment, make clear the substantive conditions of its application in legislation, and redesign and transform the condition of death penalty into immediate execution.To improve the commutation of death penalty system, so as to play a better role in restricting the execution of the death penalty immediately.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.12
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高铭暄;彭凤莲;;论立功的成立条件[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2006年05期
2 高憬宏,刘树德;死缓适用条件设置的四维思考[J];当代法学;2005年05期
3 肖中华;我国死缓制度的司法适用及相关立法评析[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年06期
4 赖早兴;;我国死刑赦免制度之完善——基于美国行政赦免制度的思考[J];湖南社会科学;2008年03期
5 黎宏;;死刑缓期执行制度新解[J];法商研究;2009年04期
6 叶良芳;;死缓适用的实质标准[J];法制资讯;2013年03期
7 赖早兴;;美国行政赦免制度及其对死刑执行的限制[J];河北法学;2006年04期
8 黄京平,石磊;论死刑缓期执行变更为死刑立即执行若干问题[J];河南社会科学;2003年04期
9 吴秋菊;立法技术探讨[J];时代法学;2004年04期
10 贾宇;死刑的理性思考与现实选择[J];法学研究;1997年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 何显兵;死缓制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
2 刘云涛;死缓制度研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
本文编号:1746142
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1746142.html