论检察机关自侦案件立案监督的完善
发布时间:2018-04-14 20:08
本文选题:自侦案件 + 立案监督 ; 参考:《延边大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:检察机关被我国宪法和法律定位为中华人民共和国法律监督机关,依法履行监督职责,保证国家的法律法规能得到正常、正确地实施,维护法制的权威与尊严。与此同时,我国刑事诉讼法也明确规定,检察机关有对贪污贿赂犯罪,渎职犯罪,国家机关工作人员利用职权实施的刑讯逼供,报复陷害等案件有立案侦查权。检察机关既是职务犯罪案件的侦查者,也是监督者,因此,检察机关处于打击刑事犯罪和监督诉讼的前沿阵地,在维护社会和谐稳定、公平正义方面都起着相当关键的作用。正因如此,如果检察机关的自侦权缺乏有效的监督,其权力就容易被滥用。司法实践当中,检察机关的刑事立案监督主要针对的是对公安机关的立案监督,而对本单位自侦部门的立案监督数量很少,且这部分由于法律没有明确规定,且各种解释、规定不够细致全面,因此检察机关对自侦案件进行的立案监督缺乏可操作性,存在盲区。怎样完善对自侦案件的立案监督,形成依法、正确、规范、高效的职务犯罪立案监督机制,是现如今检察改革的重点也是难点之一。 本文的第一部分,立足于我国国情对检察机关自侦案件立案监督的含义进行了简单的阐述,并且对为什么要对检察机关自侦案件进行立案监督的必要性进行了解释说明;第二部分本文的核心所在,以侦查监督的法律理论为依据,并且结合司法实践工作,对我国自侦案件立案监督的现状进行了论述、并且对自侦案件立案监督制度中所存在的问题进行详细的分析与论证;第三部分则在检察机关自侦案件的立案监督中存在的问题的基础上提出了相关的完善建议,希望能为完善我国检察机关自侦案件立案监督尽微薄之力。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial organ is regarded as the legal supervision organ of the people's Republic of China by the constitution and the law. The procuratorial organ performs its supervisory duty according to law, guarantees the normal and correct implementation of the laws and regulations of the country, and maintains the authority and dignity of the legal system.At the same time, China's criminal procedure law also clearly stipulates that procuratorial organs have the right to file and investigate cases such as corruption and bribery crimes, dereliction of duty, extortion of confessions by state functionaries by means of their functions and powers, retaliation, and so on.The procuratorial organ is not only the investigator but also the supervisor of the duty crime case. Therefore, the procuratorial organ is in the front position of cracking down on the criminal crime and supervising the lawsuit, which plays a key role in maintaining social harmony and stability, fairness and justice.Therefore, if the procuratorial authority lacks effective supervision, its power will be easily abused.In judicial practice, the procuratorial organ's supervision of criminal case filing is mainly aimed at the supervision of the public security organ, but the number of the self-investigating departments of the unit is very small, and this is partly due to the lack of clear provisions of the law and various interpretations.The regulations are not detailed and comprehensive enough, so the procuratorial organ's supervision of self-investigating cases is not operable and blind zone exists.How to improve the supervision of self-investigation cases and form a legal, correct, standardized and efficient supervision mechanism on duty crimes is one of the most difficult points in the procuratorial reform.In the first part of this paper, based on the situation of our country, the meaning of the supervision of self-investigating cases of procuratorial organs is simply expounded, and the necessity of filing and supervising self-investigating cases of procuratorial organs is explained.The second part of the core of this article, based on the investigation and supervision of the legal theory, and combined with judicial practice, the status quo of self-investigating cases of supervision in China is discussed.And on the basis of the problems existing in the system of self-investigating cases filing and supervision, the third part puts forward some relevant suggestions on the basis of the problems in the supervision of self-investigation cases filed by the procuratorial organs.Hope to improve our procuratorial organs self-investigation of the case filing and supervision to do a meagre.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.36
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李海清;;以人为本与职务犯罪立案监督关系辨析[J];传承;2009年18期
2 张平;;检察机关自侦案件监督机制研究[J];河北法学;2008年03期
3 潘路嘉;;检察机关自侦案件立案监督模式的比较[J];今日南国(理论创新版);2008年10期
4 陈德元 ,杨虹;自侦案件立案监督模式之选择[J];理论界;2003年03期
5 李文泉;孟凡豪;;完善职务犯罪立案监督的思考[J];中国检察官;2013年21期
6 徐蓉;;完善当前立案监督工作的思考[J];人民检察;2007年13期
7 辛宇罡;;论检察监督权在我国的形成与发展[J];天津职业院校联合学报;2013年01期
8 黄一超,李浩;强化刑事立案监督的若干问题探讨[J];政治与法律;2001年03期
9 邵义祖;张少林;吕颢;;检察机关自侦案件逮捕权上提一级问题研究[J];政治与法律;2009年07期
10 何群;;检察机关对自侦部门刑事立案监督初探[J];科技咨询导报;2007年04期
,本文编号:1750825
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1750825.html