宾丁规范论研究:本体论考察

发布时间：2018-04-15 22:03

  本文选题：规范 + 命令　； 参考：《清华法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：宾丁的规范论主要包括以下几个重要命题:作为命令的规范是存在的,它具有法的性质;规范是独立的法律规定,从概念上先于刑法条文而存在,并从刑法条文的第一部分推导出来;规范体现了统治权,以命令或者禁令的形式对人提出行为要求,从而避免对法秩序的不利后果。从宾丁意义上的规范和刑法规定的关系中可以看出,刑法条文并非命令,而是规定国家刑罚权利和义务的法律规定。宾丁规范论基础上的犯罪是指对规范的违反,但他的犯罪观并非纯粹形式主义的,而是在形式的犯罪定义内蕴含了实质的法益考量。宾丁持有实证主义的基本立场,但是从规范论中产生的质疑表明他不是纯粹的实证主义者。
[Abstract]:Bindin's normative theory mainly includes the following important propositions: the norm as an order exists, it has the nature of law, the norm is an independent legal stipulation, and it exists before the criminal law provisions conceptually.It is deduced from the first part of the criminal law that the norm embodies the ruling power and puts forward the behavior request to the person in the form of order or prohibition so as to avoid the adverse consequences to the legal order.From the relationship between the norms in the sense of Binding and the provisions of the criminal law, we can see that the provisions of the criminal law are not orders, but the legal provisions which stipulate the rights and obligations of the state penalty.The crime on the basis of Bindin's normative theory refers to the violation of norms, but his view of crime is not purely formalistic, but contains substantial considerations of legal interest in the definition of formal crime.Binding holds the basic position of positivism, but the doubt from the normative theory shows that he is not a pure positivist.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;德国维尔茨堡大学法学院;
【基金】：国家留学基金资助
【分类号】：D914
，

本文编号：1755977