刑法合宪性解释界定的另条路径

发布时间：2018-04-15 22:09

本文选题：合宪性解释 + 刑法解释　；参考：《国家检察官学院学报》2015年05期

【摘要】：刑法合宪性解释不同于传统法律解释论中的体系解释和目的解释,也不属于违宪审查制度的范畴,而是刑法体系或者目的之外,根据宪法条文包含的刑法规范或者背后的宪法价值,分析整体法律系统或者目的,对刑法条文作出解释。在对刑法条文进行合宪性解释时,需要根据平衡原则,对公民自由权利与公共秩序利益进行考量,作出适当的选择,从而确定特定具体危害行为是否应当处罚。在不当罚的考量上,宜侧重社会对该行为的容忍程度;在当罚性的考量上,则侧重该行为的危害程度情况和多发可能性。从位阶上看,刑法合宪性解释并不属于传统法律解释论所界定的论理解释,而是处于具有统辖作用的更高地位。
[Abstract]:The constitutional interpretation of criminal law is different from the system interpretation and the purpose interpretation in the traditional theory of legal interpretation, and does not belong to the category of unconstitutional review system, but is outside the criminal law system or purpose.According to the criminal law norms contained in the constitution or the constitutional value behind it, this paper analyzes the whole legal system or purpose, and interprets the criminal law provisions.In the constitutional interpretation of the articles of criminal law, it is necessary to consider the civil rights of liberty and the interests of public order according to the principle of balance, and make appropriate choices, so as to determine whether the specific harm behavior should be punished.In the consideration of improper punishment, it is advisable to focus on the degree of tolerance of the behavior in society, and on the degree of harm and the possibility of occurrence of the act in the consideration of appropriate punishment.From the perspective of rank, constitutional interpretation of criminal law does not belong to the theoretical interpretation defined by the traditional theory of legal interpretation, but is in a higher position with the function of governing.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;
【基金】：作者主持的2014年度北京师范大学自助科研基金项目“刑事一体化的现实建构”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】