渎职犯罪“造成恶劣社会影响”的理解与认定

发布时间：2018-04-26 22:03

本文选题：渎职犯罪 + 恶劣社会影响　；参考：《人民检察》2017年07期

【摘要】：实践中在认定"造成恶劣社会影响"时存在逻辑认识误区,应该科学地把握"渎职行为""直接危害结果""其他重大非物质损失后果"与"造成恶劣社会影响"的关系。在"造成恶劣社会影响"证据体系中,媒体报道、引发信访、上级重视、证人证言成为实践中比较常见的证据,准确把握上述证据的证明力和收集运用要点至关重要。应从准确理解"造成恶劣社会影响"的关键证明要素、构建规范的"造成恶劣社会影响"审查评判方法、明确"造成恶劣社会影响"的证明说理逻辑、严格准确作出"造成恶劣社会影响"的认定等四个方面,构建科学的证明路径,保证"造成恶劣社会影响"的准确认定。
[Abstract]:In practice, there is a logical misunderstanding in the determination of "bad social impact", so we should scientifically grasp the relationship between "malfeasance", "direct harm result," "other major non-material loss consequences" and "bad social impact". In the evidence system of "causing bad social impact", the media reports, causes the letter and visits, the superior pays attention, the witness testimony becomes the more common evidence in the practice, accurately grasps the above evidence the proof power and the collection application key point is very important. It is necessary to accurately understand the key proof elements of "causing adverse social impact", to construct a standard method of examining and judging "causing adverse social impact", and to clarify the reasoning logic of "causing adverse social impact". This paper makes strict and accurate identification of "bad social impact", and constructs a scientific proof path to ensure the accurate identification of "causing bad social impact".
【作者单位】：最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局一局;最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局四局;最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局二局;
【基金】：国家检察官学院科研资助项目《渎职犯罪中“造成社会恶劣影响”的理解与适用》(课题编号:GJY2015C07)研究成果
【分类号】：D924.393

【相似文献】