交通肇事逃逸行为刑事责任研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 14:43

本文选题：交通肇事 + 逃逸致人死亡　；参考：《福州大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国现代化的进程不断加快,交通运输业快速发展,交通事故也频频发生,交通肇事后逃逸和逃逸致人死亡的行为日益增加,不但增加执法机关处理该种案件的难度,同时也极大地危害了广大人民群众的生命安全和财产安全。为此,1997年制定的《中华人民共和国刑法》(简称《刑法》),把“逃逸”和“因逃逸致人死亡”纳入交通肇事罪的范围并将这两种情形规定为该罪的加重情节,同时2000年最高院出台了《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《解释》),对以上两种情形也作了详细的规定。然而,刑法条文和司法解释在交通肇事罪的主体范围、主观方面、共犯等问题上存在矛盾,理论界和司法实践部门存在较大的分歧。因此,本文试就交通肇事逃逸和相关问题进行全面深入的分析和研究,以期对刑事立法的完善和实践中的正确司法有所裨益。全文划分为四个部分：第一部分是对交通肇事逃逸行为的定义、主客观特征等基本问题进行探讨,先对交通肇事逃逸行为从整体上有一个基本的把握。第二部分是对交通肇事逃逸致人死亡应承担的刑事责任进行研究,首先分析了逃逸致人死亡的犯罪构成：行为人的主观方面可能是过失或者放任的间接故意；被害人应限于先前的交通肇事的受害人,最后,就交通肇事致人死亡的几种常见情况进行剖析。第三部分是交通肇事逃逸中的共犯和自首问题刑事责任的分析,首先分析了交通肇事逃逸中自首的成立条件,再重点运用过失共同犯罪的基本原理剖析了交通肇事罪中共犯论观点的理论缺失,从而论证创设新的罪名以弥补立法漏洞的必要性和急迫性。文章的第四部分是关于交通肇事逃逸的立法完善建议,通过分析认为交通肇事逃逸行为应成立新的罪名,即“交通肇事逃逸致人死亡罪”。并分析了该罪的犯罪构成特征,以期有益于刑法理论的完善,并对交通肇事案件在司法过程中的处理等相关问题进行了探讨。
[Abstract]:With the continuous acceleration of the modernization process in our country, the rapid development of the transportation industry and the frequent occurrence of traffic accidents, the behavior of escaping and escaping causing death after a traffic accident is increasing day by day, which not only makes it more difficult for law enforcement agencies to deal with this kind of case. At the same time, it also greatly endangers the safety of the lives and property of the broad masses of the people. For this reason, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China, enacted in 1997 (for short, the Criminal Law), included "escape" and "death caused by escape" into the scope of the crime of causing traffic accidents and stipulated these two situations as aggravating circumstances of the crime. At the same time, in 2000, the Supreme Court issued the explanation on the specific Application of the Law in the Criminal cases of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter referred to as "explanation"), and made detailed provisions on the above two situations. However, there are contradictions between the articles of criminal law and judicial interpretation on the subject scope, subjective aspect and accomplice of traffic accident crime, and there are great differences between the theoretical circle and the judicial practice department. Therefore, this paper tries to make a thorough analysis and research on the traffic hit-and-run and related problems, in order to improve the criminal legislation and the correct administration of justice in practice. The paper is divided into four parts: the first part is to discuss the definition of traffic hit-and-run behavior, subjective and objective characteristics and other basic issues, first of all, there is a basic grasp of the overall behavior of hit-and-run behavior. The second part is to study the criminal responsibility of death caused by traffic accident. Firstly, the author analyzes the criminal constitution of the death caused by escape: the subjective aspect of the perpetrator may be negligence or indirect intention of laissez-faire; Victims should be limited to the victims of previous traffic accidents. The third part is the analysis of the criminal responsibility of accomplice and voluntary surrender in hit-and-run traffic accident. Then it analyzes the lack of the theory of accomplice in traffic accident crime by using the basic principle of negligent joint crime, and proves the necessity and urgency of creating new charges to make up the legislative loopholes. The fourth part of the article is about the legislation consummation suggestion of the traffic hit-and-run, through the analysis, the author thinks that the traffic hit-and-run behavior should be established as a new crime, that is, the crime of "traffic hit-and-run causing death". The author also analyzes the criminal constitution of the crime in order to be beneficial to the perfection of the criminal law theory and probes into the related problems such as the handling of the traffic accident cases in the judicial process and so on.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】