监督过失理论在玩忽职守罪中的司法应用

发布时间：2018-05-26 15:06

本文选题：监督过失理论 + 玩忽职守罪　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：司法实践中,玩忽职守罪的责任人员追究呈现出低层化和直接化特点,尤其是“职位越高、离现场越远,责任追究越难”的现象特别严重,使得我国刑法设置这一职务犯罪的目的和功能没有很好地发挥出来。监督过失理论是关于追究监督者责任的理论,对玩忽职守罪的责任人员追究具有指导意义和参考价值。本文将监督过失理论运用于玩忽职守罪的责任人员追究,尤其是对具有监督职能的领导者因监督过失行为间接导致危害结果发生的追究其责任,以弥补司法实践中玩忽职守罪的责任人员追究所存在的不足和缺陷,更好地实现刑法规定玩忽职守罪的目的和功能。本文第一部分以真实案例引出监督过失理论在玩忽职守罪中的司法应用问题。第二部分分析了监督过失理论的司法应用要件。其中:主体要件包括身份属性条件、职责属性条件,以及辨认和控制能力条件;主观要件是指注意义务的过失,包括忽大意过失和过于自信过失;客观要件包括作为和不作为、间接因果关系等。第三部分阐述了监督过失理论应用于玩忽职守罪的必要性和可行性。主要理由是:我国刑法尚不具备单独设立监督过失罪的条件,而司法实践中对玩忽职守行为的规制又存在严重不足和缺陷;监督过失理论的应用要件与玩忽职守罪的适用要件具有相似性、互补性。第四部分论述了监督过失理论在玩忽职守罪中的具体应用方式。主要包括监督过失理论的主体要件、主观要件、客观要件在玩忽职守罪中的应用方式,还分析了监督过失理论在玩忽职守罪应用中应当受到的限制。最后是结语部分,提出了完善我国关于监督过失的立法建议。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, the investigation of personnel responsible for the crime of dereliction of duty shows the characteristics of low-level and directness, especially the phenomenon of "the higher the position, the farther away from the scene, the more difficult it is to be held accountable." The purpose and function of setting up this duty crime in criminal law of our country has not been brought into full play. The theory of supervisory negligence is the theory of investigating the supervisor's responsibility, which has guiding significance and reference value for the investigation of the person responsible for the crime of dereliction of duty. In this paper, the theory of supervisory negligence is applied to the investigation of persons responsible for the crime of neglect of duty, especially for the leaders with supervisory functions who are held responsible for the harm caused indirectly by the negligence of supervision. In order to make up for the deficiency and defect of the person responsible for the crime of dereliction of duty in judicial practice, the purpose and function of the crime of dereliction of duty stipulated in the criminal law can be better realized. The first part of this paper leads to the judicial application of the theory of supervisory negligence in the crime of dereliction of duty with real cases. The second part analyzes the elements of judicial application of supervisory negligence theory. Among them: the subjective elements include the condition of identity attribute, the condition of responsibility attribute, and the condition of identification and control ability; the subjective element refers to the negligence of duty of care, including negligence and overconfidence; the objective element includes act and omission. Indirect causality, etc. The third part expounds the necessity and feasibility of applying the theory of supervisory negligence to the crime of dereliction of duty. The main reasons are: the criminal law of our country does not have the condition of establishing the supervision of misdemeanor separately, and the regulation of dereliction of duty in the judicial practice has serious deficiency and defect; The application elements of the supervisory negligence theory and the applicable elements of the crime of dereliction of duty are similar and complementary. The fourth part discusses the specific application of the theory of oversight negligence in the crime of neglect of duty. It mainly includes the main elements of supervision negligence theory, subjective elements, objective elements in the application of the crime of dereliction of duty, but also analyzes the supervision of negligence theory in the application of the crime of dereliction of duty should be limited. The last part is the conclusion, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation of supervision fault in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.393

【参考文献】