非财产性利益贿赂入罪研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 12:27

本文选题：非财产性利益 + 贿赂　；参考：《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：权钱交易、官商勾结历来是我国党风廉政重点打击的对象,为了获取不正当利益,很多个人或集体通过贿赂高官达到目的的情形不在少数,当然与此同时,有关国家司法机关必然会对此种行为进行严厉的查处。正因如此,为了规避法律的制裁,很多更为隐蔽的贿赂方式便营运而生,这些贿赂方式最显著的共同特征就是在表面看来不具有财产性利益的属性,实际上则有着更大的危害,因为财产性利益是“钱权”的直接交易,但是加入其它种类的贿赂形式则可能对原有的正常社会秩序造成颠覆性的伤害,比如为受托人的家属提供就业机会,损害了正常的竞争上岗的公平秩序；对受托人提供各种保密信息,无疑造成了信息的走漏；给受托人在某些著作上享有署名权则是对知识产权的滥用,可以说,非财产性利益的贿赂形式有着更大的诱惑力和更强的腐蚀性。然而,对于这种危害行为,却找不到任何明确的法律条文加以规制,这直接导致该种贿赂形式屡禁不止。为了遏制这种不正之风,最直接的做法就是将非财产性利益贿赂纳入刑法的规制范围,使该行为“入罪”,只有如此,才能打击有关人员的嚣张气焰,确保我国社会主义政治、经济的正常秩序。基于此,本文对非财产性贿赂进行了较为详尽的阐述,本论文由四章组成：第一章是理论分析,主要从理论层面探讨了贿赂的概念和特征,以及非财产性利益贿赂的各种分类,并且介绍了理论界对非财产性贿赂能否入罪的不同观点；第二章通过多角度的分析,得出非财产性利益贿赂法定化的可行性以及必要性,主要从法理基础、司法实践需要、以及国内外经验等几方面展开论述；第三章则是从传统和现实等角度深入剖析了在我国将非财产性利益贿赂纳入刑法规制范围可能遇到的障碍,主要包括传统文化认同方面、司法实践中证据收集方面,以及量刑等方面的障碍；最后,结合我国的实际情况和现存问题,提出非财产性利益贿赂入罪的几点具体建议和对策,不仅包括立法层面的建议,也包括针对司法实践中可能遇到的实际障碍所提出的对策建议。
[Abstract]:Trade in power and money, collusion between government and business has always been the focus of our party's work and clean government. In order to obtain improper benefits, many individuals or groups have been bribing senior officials to achieve their goals, but at the same time, of course, The judicial organs of the countries concerned will certainly carry out strict investigation and punishment of such acts. That is why, in order to circumvent legal sanctions, many more covert forms of bribery have come into operation. The most significant common feature of these forms of bribery is that they do not appear to have the attributes of property interests, but in fact they are even more harmful. Because property interests are direct transactions of "money rights," but adding other forms of bribery may cause subversive harm to the original normal social order, such as providing employment opportunities for the trustees' families. It has damaged the fair order of normal competition and employment; the provision of all kinds of confidential information to the trustees has undoubtedly resulted in the leakage of information; giving the trustees the right of signature in certain works is an abuse of intellectual property rights, and it can be said that, The form of non-pecuniary interest bribery has more allure and stronger corrosiveness. However, there are no clear legal provisions to regulate this kind of harmful behavior, which directly leads to the repeated prohibition of this form of bribery. In order to curb this unhealthy trend, the most direct way is to bring non-property interests and bribery into the scope of the criminal law to "criminalize" the act. Only in this way can we crack down on the arrogance of the personnel concerned and ensure socialist politics in our country. A normal economic order. Based on this, this paper has carried on the more detailed elaboration to the non-property bribery, this paper is composed of four chapters: The first chapter is the theoretical analysis, mainly discusses the concept and characteristics of bribery from the theoretical level, as well as the various categories of non-property interest bribery, and introduces the different views of the theoretical circle on whether non-property bribery can be criminalized; The second chapter through the multi-angle analysis, draws the non-property benefit bribery legalization feasibility and the necessity, mainly from the legal theory foundation, the judicial practice need, as well as the domestic and foreign experience and so on several aspects carries on the elaboration; The third chapter is from the perspective of tradition and reality in-depth analysis of the non-property interests bribery into the scope of criminal law may encounter obstacles, including the traditional cultural identity, judicial practice in the collection of evidence. And the obstacles of sentencing; Finally, combined with the actual situation and existing problems in our country, this paper puts forward several specific suggestions and countermeasures for the criminalization of non-property interests bribery, including not only the legislative proposals, It also includes countermeasures and suggestions for practical obstacles that may be encountered in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.392

【相似文献】