扰乱法庭秩序罪的司法认定

发布时间：2018-05-30 14:32

本文选题：扰乱法庭秩序罪 + 适用现状　；参考：《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：法院是国家的审判机关,是诠释国家公平正义的特殊场所。良好的法庭秩序是实现审判活动程序正义的前提,程序正义得到保障,实体正义才能实现。随着诉讼活动日益成为人们解决纠纷的主要途径,扰乱法庭秩序的现象已经成为了我国庭审过程中不可忽视的问题。这不仅严重妨害了我国司法机关的正常活动,也阻碍我国法治社会的建设。为了保护法庭秩序,1997年《刑法》修订时,首次设立的扰乱法庭秩序罪。但是,1997年《刑法》的适用并没有遏制此现象的发生,笔者在分析适用现状时得出,本罪的发生没有地域的限制,行为方式也更加多样化。立法者为了更好的维护我国的法庭秩序,在此次《刑法修正案(九)》中,以原有扰乱法庭秩序罪为基础,扩大了本罪的行为对象,细化了具体罪状。但是,刑法学术界和律师界对该罪的适用问题上一直存有争议,尤其是对新增加的两项条款。本文以扰乱法庭秩序罪目前的适用现状为基础,并结合相关的理论成果,深入研究扰乱法庭秩序罪的司法认定问题,以指导司法实践。为了明确扰乱法庭秩序罪在司法实践中的认定问题,笔者认为,只有先了解本罪近几年的司法适用现状,找到本罪的适用问题,才能更有针对性地理解修订后的本罪。因此,本文首先对扰乱法庭秩序罪的适用现状进行了分析,整理了北大法宝网和中国裁判文书网上的相关案例,并从地域分布、行为方式、犯罪行为、判决年份以及量刑幅度五个方面分别进行了数据上的统计。并从《刑法修正案(九)》颁布前后的角度进行了对比分析。最终总结得出,《刑法修正案(九)》对本罪的修改,解决了原先旧法的适用范围窄小等司法现状问题,但也发现新法对于适用现状中的一些具体问题的界定仍然存在模糊性,有待进一步解决。在了解本罪的司法适用现状的基础上,本文从扰乱法庭秩序罪的客观方面和主观方面进行了详细的分析和思考,以期对适用现状中所产生的问题进行解决。在本罪的主观方面,司法现状中的他人先前行为或者法院错判问题引发的扰乱法庭秩序行为的定罪与否,一直存在问题。笔者主要是结合司法案例进行讨论分析。而对于本罪的客观方面,《刑法修正案(九)》增加了新的行为方式,在司法适用中必定会产生分歧。笔者着重阐释了新增法条中的模糊性词语,如"侮辱、诽谤、威胁"、"不庭法庭制止"、"严重扰乱法庭秩序"、"情节严重",并结合相应的适用现状,在理解学术观点之上,力求明确本罪的客观方面。在本罪与其他关联罪的界分方面,笔者主要是将扰乱法庭秩序罪与妨害公务罪、寻衅滋事罪、侮辱罪进行比较,分别从所侵犯的客体、客观方面、行为对象以及犯罪时间和地点这几方面进行比较分析,并结合司法现状中经常出现的一些特殊情形和疑难问题等方面进行理论研究。与此同时,对于扰乱法庭秩序罪的罪数形态方面和共犯形态问题,本文主要分析了当扰乱法庭秩序的行为同时触犯其他罪名时的处罚方法,以及某些行为人实行过限故意致人重伤或死亡的情况。
[Abstract]:The court is the judicial organ of the state and a special place to interpret the justice of the state. The good order of the court is the premise to realize the justice of the procedural justice of the trial, the procedural justice is guaranteed and the substantive justice can be realized. As the litigation activity is becoming the main path for people to solve the dispute, the phenomenon of disturbing the court order has become me. In order to protect the order of the court, in order to protect the order of the court, when the criminal law was revised in 1997, the crime of disturbing the court order was first set up in 1997. However, the application of the 1997 < penal law > does not contain the occurrence of this phenomenon, and the author is divided. In order to maintain our country's court order better, the legislator, in order to better safeguard the order of the court of our country, based on the original crime of disturbing the court order in the criminal law amendment (nine), has expanded the crime and refined the specific crime. The law circles have been disputed on the application of the crime, especially the two newly added terms. This article, based on the current application status of the crime of disturbing the order of the tribunal, and combined with the relevant theoretical results, deeply studies the judicial cognizance of the crime of disturbing the order of the court, in order to guide judicial practice in order to make clear the crime of disturbing the order of the court. In judicial practice, the author thinks that only by understanding the current situation of judicial application in recent years and finding the applicable problem of this crime can we understand the revised crime more pertinent. Therefore, this paper first analyzes the current situation of the crime of disturbing the order of the court, and collates the network of the North French treasure network and the Internet of the Chinese referee documents. Related cases, and from the geographical distribution, behavior, criminal behavior, the year of judgment and the range of sentencing five aspects of the statistics respectively. And from the "criminal law amendment (nine) > before and after the promulgation of the angle of the comparison analysis. Finally concluded that the amendment of the criminal law (nine) > the amendment of the original crime, solved the original application of the old law. It is also found that the definition of some specific problems in the application of the new law still has ambiguity and needs to be further solved. On the basis of understanding the current situation of the judicial application of the crime, this paper makes a detailed analysis and Reflection on the objective aspects and the main views of the crime of disturbing the order of the tribunal. There are problems in the subjective aspect of the present crime, the convictions of disturbing the court order caused by the previous behavior of others in the current judicial situation or the court misjudged problems. The author mainly discusses and analyzes the case of the judicial case. And the criminal amendment ("the criminal law amendment" is the objective aspect of the crime. Nine) > > add new ways of behavior, and there will be differences in judicial application. I emphatically explain the vague words in the new law, such as "insult, libel, threat", "stop the court to stop", "seriously disrupt the order of the court", "the plot is serious", and combine the corresponding application situation to understand the academic point of view and strive to clarify the crime. In the aspects of the crime and other related crimes, the author mainly compares the crime of disturbing the order of the court with the crime of obstruction of public affairs, the crime of provocation and the insult, and compares the aspects of the object, the objective aspect, the object of behavior and the time and place of the crime, which are often seen in the current situation of the judicature. At the same time, there are some special cases and difficult problems. At the same time, in order to disturb the form of the crime of the order of the court and the problem of the form of the accomplice, this article mainly analyzes the punishment method when the act of disturbing the order of the court is at the same time violates the other crimes, and some of the perpetrator is deliberately causing serious injury or death. The situation of death.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】