我国金融犯罪刑事立法的逻辑与规律

发布时间：2018-06-20 21:31

本文选题：金融犯罪立法 + 刑法修正案　；参考：《政治与法律》2017年04期

【摘要】：我国金融犯罪刑事立法是以七个刑法修正案的出台的方式不断向前演进的,这种演进包括对罪名的增设、对罪状的修改、对法定刑的设置。我国金融犯罪刑事立法有其逻辑与规律可循,在立法理念上,其与市场经济刑法理念协同发展;在罪名设置上,金融犯罪罪名愈加细致、罪状渐趋科学;在处罚力度上,金融犯罪刑罚兼具重刑的宽缓化与轻刑的趋重化。我国金融犯罪刑事立法尚存一些问题,如刑法典对金融犯罪的编排突破了以客体为分类依据的原则;证券与期货犯罪定罪量刑标准相同,内幕交易罪与利用未公开信息交易罪共用同一法定刑有欠科学;对伪造、变造金融票证罪与妨害信用卡管理罪的修正不同步;金融犯罪法定刑的设置有欠精细等等。对于这些问题,应当在今后的立法进程中予以克服。
[Abstract]:The criminal legislation of China's financial crime is constantly evolving in the way of seven amendments to the criminal law. This evolution includes the addition of the crime, the amendment of the crime and the setting of legal punishment. The criminal legislation of financial crime in China has its logic and law. In the legislative theory, it is coordinated with the concept of the criminal law of the market economy; There are some problems in the criminal legislation of financial crime in China, such as the principle that the criminal code of the criminal code breaks through the object as the basis for the classification of the financial crimes, and the securities and futures crime. The standard of conviction and sentencing is the same, the crime of insider trading and the sharing of the same statutory penalty for the crime of using undisclosed information are unscientific; the amendment of the crime of forgery, the transformation of the crime of financial ticket and the crime of impairing the credit card management is not synchronized; the setting of the legal punishment for financial crimes is not fine, and so on. For these problems, it should be overcome in the future legislative process.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“涉信息网络违法犯罪行为法律规制研究”(项目编号:14DB147) 2016年度中国法学会重点课题“互联网金融犯罪的法律规制”(项目编号:CLS2016ZDWT48)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】