论集资诈骗罪中“非法占有”目的

发布时间：2018-06-25 01:04

本文选题：集资诈骗 + 非法占有　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：“非法占有”作为认定集资诈骗罪一种主观超过要素,本身不在主观意志要件的评价范围内,具有较高的抽象性、隐晦性。如何在司法实践中推定集资诈骗罪的“非法占有”目的,于司法实务部门而言一直颇为棘手。司法实践中,就集资诈骗罪中“非法占有”的认定,目前相关的法律规范有三份,均为司法解释,该解释并非根据犯罪人的外在表现对主观目的进行定性,而是依据犯罪人取得集资款项的取得方式、资金走向、是否还款等方面采用推定的方式对其主观目的进行司法认定,明显与行为与责任同在的基本原则相悖,有对构成要件扩张和异化之嫌,从而导致司法推定在实践中遭遇混乱与困境。司法推定之完善,应当立足于刑法规范的立场,坚持行为与责任同在的基本原则,立足于明晰“非法占有”目的周延的基本立场,得出司法推定之原则与方法,以期为司法实务提供指引和借鉴,从更高的层面上维护行为人的基本权利和不特定对象的财产权,有效保障公共权益和公民权益的实现。
[Abstract]:"illegal possession", as a subjective excess element of the crime of financing fraud, is not within the scope of evaluation of subjective elements of will, and has a higher abstraction and obscurity. How to deduce the "illegal possession" of the crime of fraud by raising funds in judicial practice has always been quite difficult for the judicial practice department. In judicial practice, there are three relevant legal norms in the identification of "illegal possession" in the crime of financing fraud, all of which are judicial interpretations, which are not qualitative to the subjective purpose according to the external performance of the offender. On the basis of the way of obtaining the funds, the direction of the funds, whether to repay the funds and so on, the author uses the presumptive way to determine the subjective purpose of the criminal, which is obviously contrary to the basic principle that the behavior and responsibility are with each other. There is a suspicion of expansion and alienation of the constitutive elements, which leads to confusion and difficulties in the practice of judicial presumption. The perfection of judicial presumption should be based on the stand of criminal law norm, the basic principle of behavior and responsibility, the basic position of clarifying the purpose of "illegal possession", and the principle and method of judicial presumption. In order to provide guidance and reference for judicial practice, from a higher level to protect the basic rights of the perpetrator and the property rights of no specific object, effectively protect the realization of public rights and civil rights.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】