危害食品安全犯罪若干争议问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-02 20:57

本文选题：食品安全 + 有毒　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：食品安全问题在最近几年来一直倍受关注，保障人民群众餐桌上和舌尖上的安全成为一项紧急而重要的任务。要完成这项任务，必须对食品安全监管制度进行完善，特别是法律体系的完善。2013年4月通过的《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理危害食品安全刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》为打击危害食品安全犯罪提供了指导，但其中有一些规定值得探讨和商榷。本文选择了其中几个争议较大的问题，并结合最近的司法案例，进行了分析和研究。除了导言和结语，本文共分为四章。第一章分析了我国食品安全的严峻形势和立法现状，危害食品安全的案件不但数量庞大，而且其中的重大案件如三鹿奶粉案等引起的社会影响巨大，对食品安全法律体系的完善提出了迫切的要求。我国已有大量的经济部门法律和行政法规用于规范食品的生产、销售活动，刑事司法方面对危害食品安全案件的打击力度也不断加大。第三节介绍了最高人民法院和最高人民检察院最新解释的内容当中几处值得注意的地方，如罪名的选择、司法实践当中对相关产品的认定等等。第二章分析了食品、食品原料、非食品原料与有毒、有害非食品原料等概念及其相互之间的关系，厘清这些概念是分析生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪、非法经营罪等犯罪的前提条件。新的司法解释改变了有毒、有害非食品原料在司法实践当中的认定方法，这种改变的合理性值得怀疑。第三章论述了买卖非食品原料行为的定性问题。新的司法解释规定，，以提供给他人生产、销售食品为目的，违反国家规定，生产、销售国家禁止用于食品生产、销售的非食品原料，认定为非法经营罪。这是非法经营罪的又一次扩张，同时也导致司法解释内部不协调。上述行为应当认定为生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪或者生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪的共犯。第四章以谷润公司、睿钧公司及其负责人倪晓钢进口工业牛羊油并销售给食品加工企业的案件为例，对论文前面几章涉及的几个问题作了更为具体的分析，特别是案件当中所涉及的非食品原料的认定、司法解释能否溯及既往等争议焦点。本案的被告单位和被告人的行为应当认定为生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪的共犯，而不能以非法经营罪处理。
[Abstract]:Food safety has been paid more and more attention in recent years. It has become an urgent and important task to ensure the safety of the people on the table and on the tip of the tongue. To accomplish this task, we must improve the food safety supervision system, especially the legal system. The Supreme people's Court adopted in April 2013, The interpretation of some legal problems in handling criminal cases endangering food safety by the Supreme people's Procuratorate provides guidance for cracking down on crimes against food safety, but some of its provisions are worth discussing and discussing. In this paper, several controversial issues are selected, and combined with the recent judicial cases, the analysis and research are carried out. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the severe situation of food safety and the current situation of legislation in our country. The number of cases endangering food safety is not only huge, but also the social impact caused by major cases such as Sanlu milk powder case. It is urgent to improve the legal system of food safety. China has a large number of economic sector laws and administrative regulations used to regulate food production, marketing activities, criminal justice to harm food safety cases are also continuously intensified. The third section introduces the content of the latest interpretation of the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate, such as the choice of charges, judicial practice in the identification of related products and so on. The second chapter analyzes the concepts of food, food raw materials, non-food raw materials and toxic, harmful non-food raw materials and their relations, and clarifies that these concepts are the crime of producing and selling poisonous and harmful food. Preconditions for crimes such as illegal business operations. The rationality of the new judicial interpretation has changed the identification of toxic and harmful non-food raw materials in judicial practice. The third chapter discusses the nature of the behavior of buying and selling non-food raw materials. The new judicial interpretation stipulates that the non-food raw materials prohibited by the state for the production and sale of food shall be regarded as the crime of illegal operation for the purpose of providing others with the purpose of producing and selling food, in violation of state regulations and in the production and sale of non-food raw materials prohibited by the state for food production and sale. This is another expansion of the crime of illegal operation, but also leads to internal disharmony of judicial interpretation. The above-mentioned acts shall be regarded as an accomplice in the crime of producing and selling food which does not meet the safety standards or the crime of producing or selling poisonous or harmful food. In the fourth chapter, taking the case of Gu run Company, Rui Jun Company and its responsible person Ni Xiaogang as an example to import industrial cattle and sheep oil and sell it to food processing enterprises, this chapter makes a more specific analysis of the several problems involved in the previous chapters of the paper. In particular, the identification of non-food ingredients involved in the case, judicial interpretation can be retroactive and other controversial issues. The defendant's unit and the defendant's behavior shall be regarded as accomplices in the crime of producing, selling toxic and harmful food, and cannot be dealt with as the crime of illegal operation.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】