“公开盗窃说”质疑

发布时间：2018-07-03 15:30

本文选题：盗窃罪 + 抢夺罪　；参考：《法商研究》2015年03期

【摘要】：近年来,有不少学者主张公开以平和方式取走他人财物的行为成立盗窃罪。持"公开盗窃说"者提出的区分盗窃罪与抢夺罪的新标准及主要理由都值得商榷。从比较法的角度看,凡是没有规定抢夺罪的国家的刑法,为了不至于形成处罚漏洞一般都承认盗窃可以采用公开的方式进行;而规定了抢夺罪的国家的刑法一般都规定盗窃罪只能是秘密窃取。从刑法解释学以及我国的历史文化传统看,在我国秘密性仍应是盗窃罪的基本特征。贸然改变我国现行的关于盗窃罪与抢夺罪的区分标准,会极大地冲击一般民众以及司法人员的传统法律观念,并且会降低公众对刑法的认同感。
[Abstract]:In recent years, many scholars advocate that the act of taking other people's property in an open and peaceful manner is a crime of larceny. The new standards and main reasons for distinguishing theft from robbery put forward by the "public theft theory" are open to question. From the point of view of comparative law, the criminal law of those countries that do not provide for the crime of robbery generally admits that theft can be carried out in an open way in order not to form a penalty loophole; The criminal law of the country that stipulated the crime of robbery generally stipulated that the crime of theft can only be secret theft. From the point of view of the hermeneutics of criminal law and the historical and cultural tradition of our country, secrecy should still be the basic characteristic of the crime of larceny. To change the existing distinction standard between larceny and robbery will greatly impact on the traditional legal concepts of the general public and judicial personnel, and will reduce the public's identity with the criminal law.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目(14BFX153)
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】