酌定情节视角下的死刑立即执行与死缓界限研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 06:04

本文选题：死刑立即执行 + 死缓　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国的死刑执行方式有两种规定,包括死刑立即执行与死刑缓期执行。但是在具体的法律条文中并没有明确的界定二者之间的划分标准。在司法实践中,判断死刑犯是否属于“不是必须立即执行”时,犯罪分子所犯罪行的严重程度和是否具有从宽处罚情节也应当考虑进去。因此,酌定量刑情节必定会有所涉及。酌定量刑情节是法官在审判实践中积累、总结出来的。通过正确的把握犯罪手段、犯罪人的一贯表现、被害人过错、认罪态度等具有代表性的酌定量刑情节,发挥限制死刑适用的作用。法律上对酌定量刑情节予以明确化,在司法实践中充分发挥酌定情节对于死刑立即执行与死缓界限明晰的作用,使法官在审理案件时,对于整个案件存在的所有酌定量刑情节能够全部予以重视,最终进行合理审判。
[Abstract]:There are two kinds of methods of execution in our country, including immediate execution and suspended execution. However, in the specific provisions of the law there is no clear definition of the standard between the two. In judicial practice, when judging whether the death penalty is "not to be executed immediately", the severity of the crime committed by the criminal and the lenient punishment should also be taken into account. Therefore, the discretionary circumstances of sentencing must be involved. The circumstances of discretionary sentencing are accumulated and summed up by judges in trial practice. Through the correct grasp of the means of crime, the consistent performance of the criminal, the fault of the victim, the attitude of confession and other representative discretionary sentencing circumstances, play a role in restricting the application of the death penalty. In law, the circumstances of discretionary sentencing should be clearly defined, and in judicial practice, the role of discretionary circumstances in the immediate execution of the death penalty and the clarity of the boundary between the death penalty and the suspension of death will be fully brought into play, so that the judge can hear a case. For the whole case, all the discretionary circumstances of sentencing can be paid attention to, and finally a reasonable trial.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】