行政执法与刑事司法双向衔接机制研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 10:22

本文选题：行政执法 + 刑事司法　；参考：《华侨大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：虽然目前我国出台了许多关于两法衔接的规范性文件,但并没有建立完善的两法衔接机制。本文从理解成仅行政执法机关单方面朝刑事司法程序主体移送刑案的两法衔接机制传统定义出发,考察现行两法衔接机制运行中出现的问题,分析问题产生的原因,并对传统的两法衔接机制法理基础进行评判,从而指明应依据违法与处罚相适应理论,朝双向衔接的方向完善两法衔接机制。文章的论述沿着从实践到理论再回到实践的脉络进行。第一部分通过比较两法衔接机制的现存概念,提出双向化的两法衔接概念,并对两法衔接的运行现状进行介绍。第二部分点明现有的两法衔接机制仍存在的行政案件刑事化、刑事案件行政化、行政案件不罚化等问题,并对造成两法衔接不畅的原因进行分析。第三部分对两法衔接机制的法理基础进行研究,指出以权力制衡理论和法治主义理论作为两法衔接机制法理基础并不恰当,提出“违法与处罚相适应理论”。第四部分以存在的问题为导向,按照双向衔接的思路,从衔接意识、协调立法、证据转化、全面监督等多方面提出完善两法衔接机制的建议。我国采用的是行政执法与刑事司法分开的二元体制,必然涉及二者的衔接问题,笔者将两法衔接机制理解成为我国现行处罚体制必不可少的“补丁”。既然称是二者相衔接,就应当包括行政执法向刑事司法的衔接,也包括刑事司法朝行政执法的衔接,即衔接应当是双向的。正是由于主要依据权力制衡理论,才导致了刑事司法机关对行政执法机关的强势,也导致了两法衔接的单向化。笔者认为,双向化是两法衔接的必然选择,而违法与处罚相适应理论则能提供更科学的理论支持。
[Abstract]:Although there are many normative documents about the convergence of the two methods in our country, there is no perfect two-law cohesion mechanism. This paper starts from the traditional definition of the two-law connection mechanism, which is understood as the unilateral transfer of criminal cases from the administrative law enforcement agencies to the subject of the criminal justice procedure, investigates the problems in the operation of the current two law convergence mechanisms, and analyzes the causes of the problems. In addition, the author judges the legal basis of the traditional two-method cohesive mechanism, and points out that the two-method cohesive mechanism should be perfected in the direction of two-way convergence according to the adaptation theory of the violation of the law and the punishment. The discussion of the article follows the context from practice to theory and back to practice. In the first part, by comparing the existing concepts of the two methods, the author puts forward the bi-directional concept of the two methods of cohesion, and introduces the present situation of the operation of the two methods of convergence. In the second part, the author points out the problems existing in the existing convergence mechanism of the two laws, such as the criminal cases of administrative cases, the administrative cases of criminal cases, the impunity of administrative cases, and analyzes the causes of the unsmooth connection between the two laws. In the third part, the author studies the legal basis of the connection mechanism of the two laws, and points out that it is not appropriate to take the theory of power balance and the theory of rule of law as the legal basis of the mechanism of convergence between the two laws, and puts forward the theory of the adaptation of violation of law and punishment. The fourth part, guided by the existing problems, according to the idea of two-way convergence, puts forward some suggestions to perfect the two methods from the following aspects: cohesion consciousness, coordinated legislation, evidence transformation, comprehensive supervision and so on. The dual system of administrative law enforcement and criminal justice is adopted in our country, which is bound to involve the connection between the two. The author understands the mechanism of the two laws to be an indispensable "patch" of the current punishment system in our country. Since it is said that the two should be linked, it should include the administrative law enforcement to the criminal justice, but also the criminal justice to the administrative law enforcement, that is, convergence should be two-way. It is mainly based on the theory of power checks and balances, which leads to the strength of the criminal judicial organs to the administrative law enforcement agencies, and also leads to the unidirectional convergence of the two laws. The author believes that bidirectional approach is the inevitable choice of the convergence of the two laws, while the adaptation theory of violation and punishment can provide more scientific theoretical support.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1;D924.3

【相似文献】