扒窃型盗窃犯罪研究
发布时间:2018-07-09 15:07
本文选题:扒窃 + 转化 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:扒窃型盗窃罪是我国《刑法修正案(八)》新增加的盗窃罪行为方式,为更加有力打击以扒窃为行为方式的盗窃犯罪提供了刑法依据。但由于扒窃这种新的盗窃罪行为方式的出现,改变了盗窃罪原有结果犯的形态,由此带来了一些刑法理论和司法实践新的认知内容。基于此,本文首先对“扒窃”的定义进行了探讨,以此作为认识扒窃型盗窃罪的前提条件;尔后对“扒窃”行为法律规制的历史和域外立法进行了梳理,为我国刑法扒窃型盗窃罪的立法完善的进一步科学化及认定该种盗窃罪的犯罪构成提供了参考;最后,本文重点探讨和分析了扒窃型盗窃罪在司法实践中的两个难点,即:犯罪的转化问题和犯罪既未遂认定问题。针对理论和实务上存在的不同观点,通过对转化犯、既未遂犯罪形态、罪与非罪基本原理的分析并结合具体的案例得出:扒窃型盗窃罪的转化应受到严格的条件限制,扒窃型盗窃罪不存在犯罪的未遂形态的结论,,并在此基础上结合司法实务中暴露的问题提出了立法完善的建议。以期为司法实务中刑法的准确适用提供参考,维护刑法的公正性、严肃性。
[Abstract]:Pickpocketing larceny is a newly added form of larceny in China's Criminal Law Amendment (8), which provides a criminal law basis for cracking down on the crime of theft by pickpocketing. However, because of the emergence of pickpocketing, a new behavior of larceny, it has changed the form of the original resultant crime of larceny, which has brought some new cognitive contents of criminal law theory and judicial practice. Based on this, this paper first discusses the definition of "pickpocketing" as a prerequisite for understanding the crime of pickpocket theft, and then combs the history and extraterritorial legislation of the legal regulation of "pickpocketing". It provides a reference for the perfection of the legislation of the crime of pickpocket theft in our criminal law and the identification of the constitution of the crime of theft. Finally, this paper mainly discusses and analyzes the two difficulties of the crime of pickpocketing in judicial practice. Namely: the problem of crime transformation and the problem of criminal attempt. In view of the different viewpoints in theory and practice, through the analysis of the basic principles of transformed crime, attempted crime, crime and non-crime and combined with specific cases, it is concluded that the transformation of pickpocketing theft should be restricted by strict conditions. On the basis of the conclusion that there is no attempted form of crime in the crime of pickpocket theft, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the legislation combined with the problems exposed in judicial practice. In order to provide reference for the accurate application of criminal law in judicial practice, safeguard the fairness and seriousness of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 章其彦;伍光辉;;对刑法中扒窃行为的法理分析——以《刑法修正案(八)》为视角[J];河北法学;2012年05期
2 吴加明;;《刑法修正案(八)》中“扒窃”的司法实践认定[J];中国检察官;2011年14期
3 许俭;熊建华;;盗窃罪历史考察[J];科技信息(科学教研);2007年35期
4 王秋苏;;对我国《刑法修正案(八)》扩充的盗窃罪犯罪构成法律适用问题的研究[J];科技视界;2014年20期
5 伍继纯;;扒窃犯罪本益论[J];云南警官学院学报;2008年03期
6 朱以珍;赵拥军;;相对意义上的扒窃未遂不入罪——以个案中扒窃未遂对自首的影响为例[J];犯罪研究;2013年04期
7 陈文昊;;再论盗窃构成与认定[J];知识经济;2014年07期
本文编号:2109756
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2109756.html