妨害公务罪的若干问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-21 18:56

【摘要】：为了依法保护国家管理职权和公务活动,2015年通过的《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》新增加了第五款暴力袭击正在依法执行职务的人民警察的依照第一款规定从重处罚。这就对我们本条基本条文的含义提出了一个难题。因为对于妨害公务罪并没有明确规定何为“依法执行职务”何为“暴力、威胁方法”,因此本文通过列举案例为引,浅析本罪应当明确的概念和内核。以实现同案同判,更好的树立我国公务行为的严肃性和权威性,也使本罪名更易于在司法实践中进行应用。本文大体分为以下四个部分,内容如下:第一部分通过真假妨害公务案作为引子,使大家的目光集中在本罪的调整范围和主要行为方式上,从而引出下面的分析。第二部分主要从“公务”的合法性和适时性两个角度阐释公务活动具有怎样的性质,这对限制具体人员有着范围意义上的作用。第三部分主要以本罪主要的行为方式“暴力、威胁方法”为主进行行为方式的分析,并强调其范围不同、程度不同都会对本罪前三款的构成产生影响。基于此角度讨论本罪与其他犯罪的界限。第四部分是研究此罪与彼罪的界限,区分本罪与故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪和一般治安管理处罚的案件。同时也对本罪在立法方面有一些笔者的思考,在文章的结尾给出了一些在立法方面的建议。以此实现对国家公务行为权威性和严肃性的保障。
[Abstract]:In order to protect the administrative power and official activities of the state according to law, the Amendment to the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (9) passed in 2015 has added a new paragraph 5. Violent attacks on people's police officers who are performing their duties in accordance with the law shall be severely punished in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph. This raises a difficult question as to the meaning of our basic article. Because the crime of impairing official duties has not clearly stipulated what is "according to law", what is "violence, threat method", so this paper analyzes the concept and core of this crime by citing cases. In order to achieve the same sentence, better establish the seriousness and authority of our country's official acts, but also make this crime easier to be applied in judicial practice. This article is divided into the following four parts: the first part through the true and false obstruction of official cases as the introduction, so that we focus on the scope of the crime and the main behavior of the adjustment, leading to the following analysis. The second part mainly explains the nature of official activities from the perspectives of legality and timeliness, which has the function of limiting the scope of specific personnel. The third part mainly focuses on the main behavior of this crime "violence, threat method" to conduct the analysis, and emphasizes that its different scope, different degrees will have an impact on the composition of the first three paragraphs of this crime. Based on this angle, the paper discusses the boundary between this crime and other crimes. The fourth part is to study the boundary between this crime and that crime, distinguish between this crime and intentional homicide, intentional injury and general public security management punishment cases. At the same time, there are some thoughts on the legislation of this crime, and some suggestions on legislation are given at the end of the article. In this way, the authority and seriousness of state official acts are guaranteed.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】