期待可能性在我国的适用问题研究
[Abstract]:The theory of expected possibility originated from Germany at the end of the nineteenth century. After more than a century of continuous dissemination and development, it has gradually brought great influence to the field of criminal law theory and judicial practice of our country. Although the term "expectation possibility" has not been explicitly adopted in Chinese criminal law, its ideological connotation is often reflected in the general and special provisions of criminal law. The development of expectation possibility has its profound philosophical, legal and ethical foundation, and its position in the crime theory of our country is also more important. Therefore, in order to improve the theoretical system of criminal law and improve the theory and practice of crime in China, we must further explore and study the possibility of expectation. Because our country is in the social transition period, the social contradiction is increasing day by day, how to deal with the conflict between the law and the social reality effectively has become the urgent task of the theorists at present. On the basis of many domestic and foreign scholars' research results on this theory, combining the present criminal law practice of our country, we should clearly expect the possibility to be applied effectively in the criminal law system of our country. The scope of application includes the situation and the concrete application of He Ru in the practice of criminal law in our country, and then explores the corresponding way for our country's criminal law legislation theory and judicial practice to quote the possibility of expectation. The theoretical significance of the study of the possibility of expectation can be a good comprehensive and specific analysis of the theory, dig the deep theoretical foundation behind the theory, and introduce it into the criminal law system of our country. And it can improve the crime theory system of our country as a whole, and bring great promotion function to the criminal legislation and judicature of our country, including the concept, the source and the theoretical foundation of the theory. It can deepen the understanding of the theory and pave the way for its application in our country. Because different scholars have different definitions of the theory, it is inevitable to dispute the concept of the theory. Since 1897, Germany's "fetish horse case" triggered the theory of the possibility of expectation, through the efforts of many German scholars, the theory of the possibility of expectation has finally been generally accepted by the civil law criminal law theorists. It is necessary to understand the necessity and feasibility of the application of the expected possibility theory in our country if we want to make it applicable in our country. From the current legislation situation of our country and the adaptation of the theory with the basic principles and the purpose of prevention of criminal law of our country, it can effectively explain why our country can introduce this theory, so that the mechanism of crime in criminal law of our country can be consummated. And can use the theory of expectation possibility to deal with all kinds of conflicts between law and reason effectively, and if we want to bring the theory of expectation possibility into the theoretical system of criminal law of our country, we must find out in which fields it can be applied. That is to say, the scope of application of the theory in China. Does it apply to negligent crime or intentional crime? Does it belong to substantive law or superregulation? These are important issues that we should sort out. If the possibility of expectation can be used effectively in our country, the author thinks that it will bring extensive and far-reaching practical influence to the theoretical circle of criminal law of our country. From the analysis of the influence of the theory of expected possibility on the criminal law system of our country, we can clearly see that the theory has a perfect effect on the criminal law system of our country, and then through the concrete analysis of the guiding role of the theory in the field of criminal legislation and judicature of our country. It can further explain the importance of promoting the development and perfection of our country's criminal law theory system.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D924.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许桂敏;期待可能性之中国期待[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年01期
2 付立庆;人权标准说——认定期待可能性有无的一种新标准[J];杭州商学院学报;2002年04期
3 庄劲,罗树志;宽容的底限:期待可能性的消极构成[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2003年05期
4 田鹏辉;论期待可能性错误[J];沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
5 陈燕;燕鹏;;期待可能性理论的批判与借鉴[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2006年01期
6 薛莉萍;;期待可能性若干问题探析[J];理论界;2006年02期
7 张诚;崔钟云;;审慎对待期待可能性[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2006年03期
8 张吟竹;;浅议期待可能性在我国刑法中的借鉴[J];云南财经大学学报;2006年05期
9 曹玉姣;张华锋;;期待可能性再思考[J];法制与社会;2007年01期
10 童德华;;期待可能性论:作为抗制死刑的论辩术[J];湖北警官学院学报;2007年04期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 杨菲;;期待可能性在我国犯罪构成理论中的借鉴意义[A];当代法学论坛(2009年第1辑)[C];2009年
2 郑朝祖;;期待可能性的证明责任和证明标准[A];当代法学论坛(2011年第2辑)[C];2011年
3 毛元学;;无罪羁押者能否成为脱逃罪主体探析[A];当代法学论坛(二○○九年第2辑)[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈晓红;论期待可能性[N];山西党校报;2010年
2 刘媛媛;期待可能性适用之我见[N];江苏法制报;2011年
3 法律从业者 吴镇琦;期待可能性与遗弃的罪罚[N];东莞日报;2011年
4 顾昕;期待可能性在刑法中的地位[N];江苏经济报;2011年
5 羊震;期待可能性与交通肇事罪的认定[N];人民法院报;2002年
6 江爱东 望南海 任善涛;对税收执法责任的期待可能性分析[N];中国税务报;2006年
7 孙敏;期待可能性:刑法的同情之泪[N];江苏法制报;2008年
8 中国人民大学法学院 赵冉初;法律不强人所难[N];人民法院报;2011年
9 本报深度报道组记者 马立邋帅勇 张璐;违法放贷损失巨大 为何免除刑责?[N];南京日报;2007年
10 如东县检察院 缪军;期待可能性与亲亲相隐之异同[N];江苏法制报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 马宁;期待可能性研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 龙云华;期待可能性理论问题研究[D];黑龙江大学;2009年
2 刘原;论期待可能性的判定标准[D];兰州大学;2009年
3 陈元凯;期待可能性问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
4 王溪土;论期待可能性在中国的适用[D];中国政法大学;2011年
5 夏军;论期待可能性及其立法借鉴[D];华东政法学院;2003年
6 何成;期待可能性适用探究[D];西南政法大学;2004年
7 闫思雨;论期待可能性的地位与适用[D];吉林大学;2015年
8 纪琼;事后不可罚行为研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
9 王文文;论我国刑法引入期待可能性的必要性[D];扬州大学;2015年
10 孙同川;期待可能性在我国的适用问题研究[D];安徽大学;2016年
,本文编号:2161941
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2161941.html