受贿罪量刑实证研究

发布时间：2018-08-21 12:29

【摘要】：受贿犯罪是司法实践中常见罪行之一,近年来我国政府也加大了反腐倡廉力度。然而在国家加重对反腐领域的惩治之时,受贿犯罪数量却逐年增加,受贿数额亦呈上升趋势,受贿罪规制效果不如人意。社会各界纷纷发出批评和质疑之声,认为受贿罪量刑存在诸多问题是导致受贿行为无法被有效规制的重要原因之一。本文从实证的角度研究受贿罪的量刑,尽力搜集到福建省内法院90份受贿罪判决书,将其作为研究样本。并通过阅读、分析这些判决书,对所得数据进行归纳和总结,以揭示福建省受贿罪量刑的一般情况,探寻受贿罪量刑存在的问题,以期提出相应的解决方案。论文的第一部分,主要介绍福建省内受贿罪量刑的整体概况,从受贿罪刑罚立法和经实证分析得出的量刑总体情况两个方面来介绍。依据实证统计数据,归纳出受贿金额的分布情况、主刑和附加刑的适用情况以及这些受贿案件呈现出的量刑特点。第二部分,主要从法定量刑情节和酌定量刑情节的分类来分析不同的量刑情节对受贿罪刑罚的影响。受贿罪的法定量刑情节主要有自首、立功、坦白和索贿四种。对90份判决书进行分析后发现,自首和立功对受贿罪量刑的影响极为明显,索贿对缓刑的适用有一定的影响,坦白在受贿数额相当时对量刑的影响不明显,但是当同一量刑幅度内的受贿数额相差巨大时,坦白对量刑的影响较为明显。酌定量刑情节中主要分析了退缴赃款赃物和自愿认罪对量刑的影响,发现退缴赃款赃物对量刑有较大影响,自愿认罪情节在10万元以上的受贿罪案件中对量刑的影响并不明显,对10万元以下的案件量刑的影响要明显的多。第三部分,主要揭示受贿罪量刑中存在的问题。经过案例分析,发现受贿罪量刑的处理存在量刑不均衡、轻刑化等现象,在财产附加刑适用、判决书量刑说理等方面也存在问题。第四部分,主要分析产生各种问题的原因,认为前述问题主要由以下几个原因造成：立法存在问题；司法人员的刑罚观念存在问题,重定罪轻量刑；受贿罪缺乏具体量刑规范指导；刑事政策的影响等。在论文的最后部分,笔者针对前述的问题,提出了规范受贿罪量刑的一些思考,主要有五点：要完善立法规定；完善受贿罪量刑指导规则；完善刑事案例指导制度；加强刑事判决书量刑说理；重视受贿罪罪中量刑情节。希望通过这些完善措施,可以更好地规制受贿罪量刑,使受贿罪刑罚制裁达到理想的效果。
[Abstract]:Bribery is one of the common crimes in judicial practice. However, the number of bribery crime is increasing year by year, and the amount of bribery is on the rise, and the regulation effect of bribery crime is not satisfactory. People from all walks of life have issued criticism and doubt that bribery sentencing problems are one of the important reasons leading to the bribery behavior can not be effectively regulated. This paper studies the sentencing of bribery crime from an empirical point of view, and tries to collect 90 judgments on bribery crime in Fujian Provincial Court, taking it as a research sample. Through reading, analyzing these judgments and summarizing the obtained data, to reveal the general situation of sentencing of bribery crime in Fujian Province, to explore the existing problems in sentencing of bribery crime, in order to put forward the corresponding solutions. The first part of the paper mainly introduces the overall situation of the sentencing of bribery in Fujian Province, from the crime of bribery punishment legislation and empirical analysis of the overall situation of sentencing two aspects to introduce. According to the empirical statistical data, the distribution of the amount of bribery, the application of the principal punishment and the supplementary punishment, and the sentencing characteristics of these bribery cases are summarized. The second part mainly analyzes the influence of different circumstances of sentencing on the punishment of bribery from the classification of statutory circumstances of sentencing and discretionary circumstances of sentencing. The statutory sentencing circumstances of bribery crime mainly include surrender, meritorious service, confession and bribery. After the analysis of 90 judgments, it is found that the influence of surrender and meritorious service on the sentencing of the crime of accepting bribes is very obvious, and that the demand for bribes has a certain influence on the application of probation, and that the effect of confession on sentencing is not obvious when the amount of bribery is equal. However, when the amount of bribery within the same range of sentencing varies greatly, the effect of confession on sentencing is obvious. In the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, the author mainly analyzes the influence of the return of the stolen money and the voluntary confession on the sentencing, and finds that the return of the stolen money has a great influence on the sentencing, and the effect of voluntary confession on the sentencing is not obvious in the case of the crime of accepting bribes more than 100000 yuan. The impact of sentencing on cases under 100000 yuan is much more obvious. The third part, mainly reveals the crime of bribery sentencing problems. Through the case analysis, it is found that there are some problems in the sentencing of bribery crime, such as unbalanced sentencing, light punishment and so on, in the application of property additional punishment, judgment sentencing reasoning and so on. The fourth part, mainly analyzes the causes of various problems, thinks that the above-mentioned problems are mainly caused by the following reasons: the problems in legislation, the problems in the concept of punishment of judicial personnel, and the emphasis on conviction and punishment; The bribery crime lacks the concrete sentencing standard instruction; the influence of the criminal policy and so on. In the last part of the paper, the author puts forward some thoughts on how to regulate the sentencing of bribery crime, which includes five points: perfecting the legislative provisions, perfecting the sentencing guidance rules of bribery crime, perfecting the guidance system of criminal cases; Strengthen criminal judgment sentencing reasoning; pay attention to the crime of bribery sentencing circumstances. It is hoped that through these perfect measures, we can better regulate the punishment of bribery crime and make the punishment of bribery crime achieve the ideal effect.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.13

【相似文献】