论受贿罪犯罪门槛的科学设置

发布时间：2018-09-19 08:23

【摘要】：无论是理论界还是实务界,均日渐倾向于否定立法明确规定贪污贿赂犯罪定罪量刑标准的做法,而此后如何设置受贿罪的犯罪门槛,理论界和立法、司法实务界存在不同认识,目前有"概括数额+情节说"、"情节说"、"数额要素否定说"三种观点。从更好地体现受贿罪的犯罪客体、发挥刑法的行为指引功能等目的考虑,对于受贿罪犯罪门槛的设置,应当废弃明示、刚性的数额、情节标准,而采取隐性的方式,由司法人员根据个案情况,综合受贿的主体、行为方式、谋取的利益性质、危害后果、数额等犯罪门槛的组成因素来考虑是否入罪;对于数额较小的受贿,在具备其他犯罪门槛的组成因素时也应定罪。严厉打击受贿犯罪的同时,司法机关也要注意依据但书条款,将一部分情节轻微的受贿行为作出罪处理,相应的司法观念也应当有所变化。
[Abstract]:Both theorists and practitioners tend to negate the practice of legislating to specify the conviction and sentencing standards of corruption and bribery crimes, and how to set up the threshold of bribery crime after that, there are different understandings among the theorists and the legislative and judicial practitioners. At present, there are three viewpoints: the theory of summing up the plot of the amount and the theory of the negation of the element of the amount. Considering the purpose of better embodying the object of the crime of accepting bribes and giving play to the behavioral guidance function of the criminal law, regarding the setting of the threshold of the crime of accepting bribes, the explicit, rigid amount and plot standard should be abandoned, and the implicit way should be adopted. Whether or not to be criminalized is considered by the judicial personnel according to the circumstances of the case, the subject of the bribery, the mode of conduct, the nature of the benefit sought, the consequence of the harm, the amount of the criminal threshold, and so on; for the small amount of bribery, A conviction should also be made when the constituent elements of other criminal thresholds are present. While cracking down on bribery crime, the judicial organs should pay attention to dealing with some minor bribery acts according to the proviso clause, and the corresponding judicial concepts should also be changed.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院刑事法律科学研究院;
【分类号】：D924.392

【参考文献】