论必要共犯的可罚性
发布时间：2018-09-19 10:12
【摘要】：必要共同犯罪中的必要共犯行为是否可罚存在立法者意思说和实质说等观点的分歧,我国司法实务对此也持不尽一致的立场。实务与学理围绕必要共犯可罚性的纷争背后,其实是形式还是实质地理解必要共同犯罪条款的对立。依据反对解释和当然解释等形式地理解立法者意思的解释路径,虽然在不少场合能得出合理的答案,但可罚与否不应该只是一个形式逻辑的推论问题;大多数实质说则沉浸于违法性和责任等有无的迷思,而忽略了从违法性和责任的程度角度考察必要共犯的可罚性。对于必要共犯行为,应当在比例原则的制约下,结合各构成要件的规范目的,分为离心型犯罪、向心型犯罪等不同类型,具体地判断其可罚性之有无。
[Abstract]:Whether the necessary accomplice in the necessary joint crime can be punished has different views such as the idea of legislator and the theory of substance. The judicial practice of our country also holds a different position on this point. Behind the dispute between practice and theory about the punishment of necessary accomplice, is it the form or the essence of understanding the contradiction of the clause of necessary joint crime. In order to understand the interpretation path of legislator's meaning according to the form of anti-interpretation and ex-officio interpretation, though reasonable answers can be obtained on many occasions, the question of whether punishment can be punished or not should not be just a logical corollary. Most of the essential theories are immersed in the myth of illegality and responsibility and neglect to examine the punishment of necessary accomplices from the angle of illegality and responsibility. Under the restriction of the principle of proportionality, the necessary accomplice should be divided into different types, such as centrifugal crime, concentric crime and so on, according to the normative purpose of each constituent element, and the possibility of punishment should be judged concretely.
【作者单位】： 中国青年政治学院法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“刑法规范目的理论及其实务影响研究”(14SFB30015)之阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914
本文编号：2249833
[Abstract]:Whether the necessary accomplice in the necessary joint crime can be punished has different views such as the idea of legislator and the theory of substance. The judicial practice of our country also holds a different position on this point. Behind the dispute between practice and theory about the punishment of necessary accomplice, is it the form or the essence of understanding the contradiction of the clause of necessary joint crime. In order to understand the interpretation path of legislator's meaning according to the form of anti-interpretation and ex-officio interpretation, though reasonable answers can be obtained on many occasions, the question of whether punishment can be punished or not should not be just a logical corollary. Most of the essential theories are immersed in the myth of illegality and responsibility and neglect to examine the punishment of necessary accomplices from the angle of illegality and responsibility. Under the restriction of the principle of proportionality, the necessary accomplice should be divided into different types, such as centrifugal crime, concentric crime and so on, according to the normative purpose of each constituent element, and the possibility of punishment should be judged concretely.
【作者单位】： 中国青年政治学院法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“刑法规范目的理论及其实务影响研究”(14SFB30015)之阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜晓明;;陷害教唆的可罚性[J];赤峰学院学报(科学教育版);2011年04期
2 韩帅;;论陷害教唆之可罚性[J];法治与社会;2010年09期
3 任鹏程;;刍议教唆自杀行为之可罚性[J];才智;2011年14期
4 田芳春;;浅议预备犯刑事可罚性[J];今日中国论坛;2013年08期
5 郑丽艳;论未遂的教唆的可罚性[J];法律适用;2004年02期
6 叶峰;;略论未遂犯的可罚性范围[J];法制与社会;2008年35期
7 杜琪;;论环境领域公务员可罚性[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2011年01期
8 陈河源;;试论未遂可罚性基础上的不能未遂[J];刑事法评论;2013年01期
9 王指南;;良心行为排除刑事可罚性问题研究[J];学理论;2014年02期
10 余辉胜;陷害教唆与侦查圈套的可罚性探讨[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2003年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 罗森;教唆自杀可罚性解释路径新探[D];海南大学;2016年
2 武良军;教唆未遂的可罚性问题研究[D];海南大学;2012年
3 周俊生;数额犯未遂问题研究[D];华南理工大学;2014年
4 刘颖;教唆自杀行为的可罚性研究[D];江西财经大学;2013年
5 周志东;不能未遂犯问题比较研究[D];山东大学;2008年
6 吕伟;陷害教唆研究[D];南昌大学;2008年
，本文编号：2249833
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2249833.html
