骗取贷款罪的司法认定和立法完善
发布时间：2018-09-19 10:39
【摘要】：2006年,国家出台了《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(六)》,其中一项新增条款就是针对骗取贷款行为,严法立规。立法模式上,创新性的采用贷款目的与手段同时规制取代了以往仅注重贷款目的的规制;但在实践中,如何认定骗取贷款行为认定存在很多问题。本文结合案例,在当前司法基础上,就骗取贷款行为的认定问题进行深入研究,以适应当前的经济发展和法治要求。另外,本文将通过对我国打击金融犯罪的刑事政策和立法模式的研究,来对立法提出合理的完善建议。围绕本罪的司法认定和立法完善,本文分四部分进行论证。第一部分提出本罪司法认定困难的问题并进行原因分析;第二部分深入研究本罪的犯罪构成,重点论述本罪的客观方面,即欺骗行为、欺骗行为与取得贷款的因果关系和损害后果;第三部分为骗取贷款罪的司法认定,包括罪与非罪、犯罪形态和其他疑难问题;第四部分为立法完善建议,包括将本罪改为抽象危险犯,将恶意逃废信贷债务的行为入罪,将当前以金融管理和单一刑事为主体调整为以金融交易和综合治理为主体。
[Abstract]:In 2006, the people's Republic of China Criminal Law Amendment (6) was issued, one of the new provisions is to defraud loans, strict regulations. In the legislative model, the innovative use of loan purposes and means of regulation has replaced the previous regulation of only the purpose of loans, but in practice, there are many problems in how to identify the behavior of loan fraud. On the basis of current judicature, this paper makes an in-depth study on the identification of loan fraud in order to meet the needs of the current economic development and the rule of law. In addition, through the research on the criminal policy and legislative model of our country to crack down on financial crime, this paper will put forward some reasonable suggestions to improve the legislation. Around this crime judicial cognizance and legislation consummation, this article is divided into four parts to carry on the demonstration. The first part puts forward the problem of the difficulty of judicial cognizance of this crime and analyzes the reasons; the second part deeply studies the criminal constitution of this crime, focusing on the objective aspect of the crime, namely the deceptive behavior, The third part is the judicial determination of the crime of obtaining loans by fraud, including the crime and non-crime, the form of crime and other difficult problems. It includes changing this crime into an abstract dangerous crime, criminalizing the malicious act of evading and cancelling credit debts, and adjusting the current financial management and single criminal as the main body to take financial transaction and comprehensive management as the main body.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2249898
[Abstract]:In 2006, the people's Republic of China Criminal Law Amendment (6) was issued, one of the new provisions is to defraud loans, strict regulations. In the legislative model, the innovative use of loan purposes and means of regulation has replaced the previous regulation of only the purpose of loans, but in practice, there are many problems in how to identify the behavior of loan fraud. On the basis of current judicature, this paper makes an in-depth study on the identification of loan fraud in order to meet the needs of the current economic development and the rule of law. In addition, through the research on the criminal policy and legislative model of our country to crack down on financial crime, this paper will put forward some reasonable suggestions to improve the legislation. Around this crime judicial cognizance and legislation consummation, this article is divided into four parts to carry on the demonstration. The first part puts forward the problem of the difficulty of judicial cognizance of this crime and analyzes the reasons; the second part deeply studies the criminal constitution of this crime, focusing on the objective aspect of the crime, namely the deceptive behavior, The third part is the judicial determination of the crime of obtaining loans by fraud, including the crime and non-crime, the form of crime and other difficult problems. It includes changing this crime into an abstract dangerous crime, criminalizing the malicious act of evading and cancelling credit debts, and adjusting the current financial management and single criminal as the main body to take financial transaction and comprehensive management as the main body.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 周强;罗开卷;;骗取贷款罪疑难问题探讨[J];法律适用;2012年02期
2 顾肖荣;;金融刑法的制度能力建设与抵御金融风险[J];法学;2009年08期
3 吴华清;;论骗取金融机构贷款、信用罪[J];中国检察官;2006年09期
4 汪维才;;论恶意逃废债务行为的犯罪化[J];中国刑事法杂志;2006年01期
5 黄欣,黄皓;关于我国金融法治重构的思考[J];中国法学;2002年04期
6 王爱俭,孟昊;建立我国个人信用制度对策研究[J];经济学动态;2001年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 马长生 ;贺志军;;四个层面解析骗取贷款罪司法认定[N];检察日报;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 赵楠楠;试论骗取贷款罪的认定[D];南京大学;2012年
，本文编号：2249898
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2249898.html
