“法益可恢复性犯罪”概念之提倡

发布时间：2018-10-22 10:13

【摘要】：停止于既遂形态的犯罪行为,虽无回溯中止的可能,但尚存经由"法益恢复"路径得以轻刑化甚或出罪化评价的机会,相关法律文本对此命题已经进行个别化的确认。对于"法益恢复"现象的解释,"特殊中止说"回避了犯罪既遂"构成要件齐备说"的通说观点,否定了犯罪既遂标准多样化立法权力选择的正当性。"个人解除刑罚事由"存在基础理论薄弱、范畴局限和类型化区分不足的弊端,科学性不足。依托类型化思维工具,"法益可恢复性犯罪"的概念抽象、条件判断及其从宽评价,在报应主义和功利主义惩罚根据的双重视域均得自洽,在法益保护可逆性路径以及恢复性制裁的论证视域理由正当,且系刑法从宽事由体系的有益补充,宜作为"法益恢复"现象轻刑化或出罪化评价的理论基础。
[Abstract]:Although there is no possibility of retroactive suspension of criminal acts in the accomplished form, there is still an opportunity for light punishment or even criminal evaluation through the path of "legal interest recovery". The relevant legal texts have confirmed this proposition individually. For the interpretation of the phenomenon of "recovery of legal interests", the "special suspension theory" evades the general view of "complete elements of crime accomplishment", and negates the legitimacy of the choice of diversified legislative power of the standard of accomplished crime. " The reason of individual lifting penalty is weak in basic theory, limited in category and insufficient in categorization, so it is not scientific enough. Relying on the type of thinking tools, the concept of "recoverable crime of legal interest" is abstract, the condition judgment and its lenient evaluation, in the dual horizon of retribution and utilitarianism punishment basis, are all self-consistent. It is justified in the reversible path of legal interest protection and the argument of restorative sanction, and it is a useful supplement to the lenient subject system of criminal law, and should be used as the theoretical basis for the light punishment or criminal evaluation of the phenomenon of "legal interest recovery".
【作者单位】：华东政法大学研究生教育院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】