火灾事故责任认定的法律救济
发布时间：2018-11-18 17:37
【摘要】：火灾事故责任认定是公安消防机构重要的法定职责，但司法实践中对火灾事故责任认定的性质产生了严重的分歧。由于新《消防法》的出台，取消了公安消防机构对火灾事故“责任”的认定，加之公安部在此前的文件中关于火灾事故责任认定的规定存在冲突，使得火灾事故责任认定在司法实践和法律规范中产生了不同的观点和争议。“火灾事故责任认定”和“火灾事故认定”两个不同的概念使理论学者对公安消防机构的职责产生了不同认识，特别是对火灾事故责任认定行为的可诉性分析，也由此产生救济途径的不同争议，这严重制约了公安消防机构对火灾事故责任的调查工作和对火灾事故当事人权益的保护。本文从保护行政相对人权益和维护法律权威的角度出发，就火灾事故责任认定的概念及法律属性、火灾事故责任认定的可诉性及救济途径、火灾事故责任认定结论在民刑部门法中的思考进行了系统阐述。 根据法律实务工作者在司法实践中的做法和法学者关于火灾事故责任认定的理论，，通过结合消防法律法规的有关规定，本文对火灾事故责任认定作出了自己的定义，从行政法角度对行政诉讼受案范围的规定进行分析，并对火灾事故责任认定的法律性质进行了定性，通过分析本文明确观点：火灾事故责任认定是一种行政确认行为，是一种具有特殊性的具体行政行为，根据法律法规的规定应属于行政诉讼受案范围。本文主要从火灾事故认定主体、火灾事故认定的法律性质、我国行政诉讼法受案范围对火灾事故认定的可诉性进行了分析，并对比介绍了有关火灾事故认定行为不可诉的观点。本文最重要部分，是针对在司法实践中存在的火灾事故责任认定的争议，根据第二部分关于火灾事故责任认定的可诉性分析，提出了在火灾事故责任认定发生争议后的行政救济途径，本文认为应该包括：行政复议、行政救济、国家赔偿、行政声明异议。通过对本部分内容的阐述，希望对维护行政相对人的权益起到积极的促进作用。最后，本文主要针对在民事或刑事诉讼中，火灾事故认定书在诉讼活动中的作用及在运用中存在的问题进行了观点阐述。
[Abstract]:The determination of responsibility for fire accident is an important legal duty of public security fire protection organization, but in judicial practice there are serious differences on the nature of responsibility determination of fire accident. As a result of the introduction of the new "Fire Protection Law," the public security fire protection agencies have been cancelled from their "responsibility" for fire accidents. In addition, in the previous documents of the Ministry of Public Security, there was a conflict in the provisions on the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. It makes the responsibility of fire accident in the judicial practice and legal norms produced different views and disputes. The two different concepts of "responsibility determination of fire accident" and "identification of fire accident" have made the theorists have different understanding of the responsibility of public security fire protection institutions, especially the analysis of the actionable behavior of the responsibility determination of fire accidents. There are also different disputes on the ways of relief, which seriously restricts the investigation of the fire accident responsibility and the protection of the rights and interests of the parties involved in the fire accident. From the point of view of protecting the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and maintaining the legal authority, this paper discusses the concept and legal attribute of the responsibility for fire accident, the justiciability of the responsibility for the fire accident and the ways of relief. The conclusion of responsibility determination of fire accident is systematically expounded in the law of civil and criminal law. According to the practice of legal practitioners in judicial practice and the theory of liability determination of fire accident by legal scholars, this paper defines the responsibility of fire accident by combining the relevant provisions of fire protection laws and regulations. From the angle of administrative law, this paper analyzes the provisions of the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, and makes a qualitative analysis of the legal nature of the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. Through the analysis of this article, it is clear that the determination of responsibility for fire accidents is an act of administrative confirmation. It is a specific administrative act with particularity, according to the regulation of laws and regulations, it should belong to the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation. This paper mainly analyzes the justiciability of fire accident from the main body of fire accident, the legal nature of fire accident determination, the scope of accepting cases of administrative procedure law in our country, and introduces the viewpoint that the fire accident cognizance act is non-actionable. The most important part of this paper is to aim at the dispute of responsibility determination of fire accident existing in judicial practice, according to the analysis of the litigability of responsibility determination of fire accident in the second part. This paper puts forward the ways of administrative relief after the dispute over the determination of responsibility for fire accident, which should include: administrative reconsideration, administrative relief, state compensation and dissent of administrative declaration. Through the elaboration of this part, we hope to promote the rights and interests of administrative counterpart. Finally, this paper mainly discusses the role of the fire accident cognizance document in the litigation activities and the problems existing in the application in the civil or criminal proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14;D924.3
本文编号：2340681
[Abstract]:The determination of responsibility for fire accident is an important legal duty of public security fire protection organization, but in judicial practice there are serious differences on the nature of responsibility determination of fire accident. As a result of the introduction of the new "Fire Protection Law," the public security fire protection agencies have been cancelled from their "responsibility" for fire accidents. In addition, in the previous documents of the Ministry of Public Security, there was a conflict in the provisions on the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. It makes the responsibility of fire accident in the judicial practice and legal norms produced different views and disputes. The two different concepts of "responsibility determination of fire accident" and "identification of fire accident" have made the theorists have different understanding of the responsibility of public security fire protection institutions, especially the analysis of the actionable behavior of the responsibility determination of fire accidents. There are also different disputes on the ways of relief, which seriously restricts the investigation of the fire accident responsibility and the protection of the rights and interests of the parties involved in the fire accident. From the point of view of protecting the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and maintaining the legal authority, this paper discusses the concept and legal attribute of the responsibility for fire accident, the justiciability of the responsibility for the fire accident and the ways of relief. The conclusion of responsibility determination of fire accident is systematically expounded in the law of civil and criminal law. According to the practice of legal practitioners in judicial practice and the theory of liability determination of fire accident by legal scholars, this paper defines the responsibility of fire accident by combining the relevant provisions of fire protection laws and regulations. From the angle of administrative law, this paper analyzes the provisions of the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, and makes a qualitative analysis of the legal nature of the determination of responsibility for fire accidents. Through the analysis of this article, it is clear that the determination of responsibility for fire accidents is an act of administrative confirmation. It is a specific administrative act with particularity, according to the regulation of laws and regulations, it should belong to the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation. This paper mainly analyzes the justiciability of fire accident from the main body of fire accident, the legal nature of fire accident determination, the scope of accepting cases of administrative procedure law in our country, and introduces the viewpoint that the fire accident cognizance act is non-actionable. The most important part of this paper is to aim at the dispute of responsibility determination of fire accident existing in judicial practice, according to the analysis of the litigability of responsibility determination of fire accident in the second part. This paper puts forward the ways of administrative relief after the dispute over the determination of responsibility for fire accident, which should include: administrative reconsideration, administrative relief, state compensation and dissent of administrative declaration. Through the elaboration of this part, we hope to promote the rights and interests of administrative counterpart. Finally, this paper mainly discusses the role of the fire accident cognizance document in the litigation activities and the problems existing in the application in the civil or criminal proceedings.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.14;D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曹晓强;火灾原因和事故责任认定的探讨[J];成都电子机械高等专科学校学报;2005年01期
2 张淑芳;行政声明异议制度研究[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年02期
3 蔡小雪;;关于当前行政诉讼范围若干争议问题的研究[J];法律适用;2006年Z1期
4 陈娟;;行政声明异议初探[J];武汉交通职业学院学报;2006年04期
5 郑自泉;;浅析火灾事故原因和责任认定的可诉性[J];科技信息;2011年18期
6 陈凡凡;;试论火灾调查存在的问题和建议[J];科协论坛(下半月);2012年03期
7 夏欣平;;我国火灾事故责任认定制度亟待完善[J];商业文化(上半月);2012年04期
8 于绪亭,陈雪琴;论火灾事故责任认定的可诉性[J];消防科学与技术;2004年S1期
9 王健;王楷然;;当前火灾事故调查工作的现状分析及对策[J];消防技术与产品信息;2012年01期
10 杨爱勇;;对新《消防法》实施后开展火灾事故认定的思考[J];中国新技术新产品;2012年06期
本文编号：2340681
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2340681.html
