对有影响力的人行贿罪构成研究
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of politics, society and economy in our country, the relationship between all kinds of social subjects becomes more and more complicated. At the same time, there must be some new problems of corruption, new forms of bribery, Moreover, the subject has extended to some "influential" personnel other than state functionaries, which makes the former criminal law norms of our country become vacant in punishing such acts. Thus, on 29 August 2015, the 16th meeting of the standing Committee of the Twelfth National people's Congress formally adopted the Amendment to the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (9). Amendment (IX) of the Criminal Law added a new crime of bribery in 46 and listed it after article 390 of the Criminal Law as one of the 390 bis of the Criminal Code. The crime is now referred to as "bribery of influential persons". The Criminal Law Amendment (9) criminalizes bribery of influential persons. On the one hand, in order to meet the objective needs of our country in the fight against the complex and changeable crime of corruption, on the other hand, it is also in the effective implementation of the obligations established for States by the United Nations Convention against Corruption, As a result, the Criminal Law Amendment (9) adds the crime of bribery to influential people. As the time of the amendment is still short, the theoretical research and practical experience on this crime is not mature. Although the crime of bribery is also one of the crimes of bribery, the crime of giving bribes to influential people is also a kind of crime. However, the understanding and application of the constitutive elements of the crime is mainly based on the relevant theories of the traditional bribery crime. However, there have always been disputes in the legal theory and judicial practice about the constitutive elements of the crime of traditional bribery, and the specific standards of determination. The controversy over these elements will inevitably lead to the existence of different standards in the understanding and determination of the crime with the help of the traditional bribery crime. It is necessary for us to understand and grasp the constitutive elements of this crime on the basis of current legislation. The main content of this paper is divided into three parts: the first part, under the guidance of the traditional bribery crime theory, on the basis of the norms of the constitutive elements of the bribery crime in the current legislation, the legislative overview of the constitutive elements of this crime is expounded. Combined with the traditional view of the constitutive elements of the crime of bribery, the present constitutive elements of this crime are understood. In the second part, after combing the present situation of the constitutive elements of this crime from the angle of current legislation and the basic theory of traditional bribery, this part focuses on the subjective elements and objects of this crime. This paper analyzes the constitution of the objective aspect and points out the unreasonable provisions of the constitutive elements of this crime under the current legislation combined with the particularity of the crime. The third part, in the second part of the article on the elements of the crime to a correct understanding, and related issues on the legislative level of the analysis, according to the specific issues, combined with the traditional bribery crime and the particularity of the crime, The author puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of legislation in view of the problems existing in the constitutive elements of this crime.
【学位授予单位】:贵州民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.392
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张荣川;几类行贿罪特殊主体的认定[J];人民检察;2001年02期
2 ;什么是行贿罪[J];农村实用技术与信息;2001年01期
3 林既立 ,林应懋;是代购物品还是行贿罪[J];法学;1985年07期
4 戴长林,宁诗敏;关于行贿罪若干问题探讨[J];现代法学;1994年06期
5 施德文;王某的行为是否构成行贿罪[J];律师世界;1997年06期
6 张容;王某的行为不构成行贿罪[J];律师世界;1997年09期
7 郭光华;何为对公司、企业人员行贿罪[J];人民公安;1998年01期
8 吴绳昌;新刑法对行贿罪的规定有哪些修改?[J];警察天地;1997年09期
9 冯菁;行贿罪若干问题的探讨[J];社会科学;2000年11期
10 白云;论行贿罪与受贿罪的非对向关系[J];广东商学院学报;2000年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 周荣义;洪发胜;;中国跨国公司海外行贿罪的现实思考——以《刑法修正案(八)》第29条的实施为背景[A];赣台法学论坛文集——江西省犯罪学研究会年会(2011年)[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 裘立华;行贿多、行贿罪少的现象得改改了[N];济南日报;2014年
2 陆郴;对行贿罪追究不力的原因及对策[N];人民法院报;2000年
3 王俊杰;建议立法机关修改行贿罪标准[N];民主与法制时报;2006年
4 范媛丽;关于“李某某的行为是否构成行贿罪”案件解析[N];中国黄金报;2009年
5 河南省人民检察院 李涛;行贿罪立法应适度从严突出重点[N];检察日报;2011年
6 常州市武进区检察院 施卓超;谋取正当利益是否构成行贿罪[N];江苏法制报;2011年
7 记者 郑赫南;增设“对有影响力者行贿罪”[N];检察日报;2013年
8 黄强;行贿罪中行贿人“被追诉前”时间的界定[N];江苏法制报;2013年
9 韦遥远 灵川县人民法院;浅析行贿罪责任追究瑕疵[N];广西法治日报;2014年
10 刘生荣 胡云腾;行贿罪的法律分析[N];检察日报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吴鹏峰;行贿罪刑法规制问题及完善[D];内蒙古大学;2010年
2 刘小维;行贿罪若干问题研究[D];西安理工大学;2009年
3 于化萍;行贿罪若干问题探析[D];吉林大学;2010年
4 丁瑞;行贿罪若干问题研究[D];郑州大学;2007年
5 江剑飞;行贿罪若干问题研究[D];河北大学;2015年
6 李红超;行贿罪若干司法疑难问题研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
7 徐丹萍;论行贿行为的刑法规制[D];苏州大学;2015年
8 胡强;论我国行贿罪的立法完善[D];南昌大学;2015年
9 胡忠清;行贿罪中“不正当利益”的探究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
10 陈晶;利用影响力受贿罪对向行为刑法规制研究[D];江西财经大学;2015年
,本文编号:2403318
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2403318.html