论危险犯中自动解除危险状态的定性
发布时间：2019-02-18 17:02
【摘要】：自动解除危险状态是指行为人实施的危害行为足以造成实害结果发生的法定危险状态，，且完全符合刑法分则中规定的犯罪构成，但在实害结果发生之前，行为人又在自己主观意志支配下积极采取措施解除该危险状态，使得实害结果最终没有发生的情形。它具有时间特定性、自动性和有效性三个特征，具体可分为自动解除具体危险状态和自动解除抽象危险状态两种类型。 目前，刑法理论界关于自动解除危险状态这一情形的性质认定主要存在危险犯既遂说、危险犯中止说、实害犯中止说和危险犯的结果加重犯中止说四种观点，这四种观点都存在不同程度的缺陷，需要重新认识。 通过对犯罪停止形态的相互排斥性、危险犯既遂的界定、犯罪中止的成立条件、危险犯与相应实害犯的关系等相关理论根据的梳理，可见对自动解除危险状态的定性问题，危险犯既遂说仍更具合理性。无论是自动解除具体危险状态还是自动解除抽象危险状态，其定性上不存在实质区别，只要法定危险状态已经出现，事后行为人积极采取措施解除该危险状态防止实害结果发生的都应认定为危险犯的既遂，其中应该特别注意的是对具体危险状态与抽象危险状态的准确判断。
[Abstract]:Automatic release from danger refers to the legal dangerous state in which the act of harmfulness carried out by the actor is sufficient to cause the actual harm to occur, and fully conforms to the constitution of the crime specified in the special provisions of the criminal law, but before the actual harm result occurs, Under the control of his own subjective will, the actor takes active measures to relieve the dangerous state, so that the actual harm result does not happen in the end. It has three characteristics: time specificity, automatism and validity. It can be divided into two types: automatic release of specific danger state and automatic release of abstract dangerous state. At present, there are four viewpoints in the criminal law theorists on the nature of the situation of automatic release of dangerous state, namely, the theory of the completion of dangerous criminals, the theory of suspension of actual offenders and the theory of suspension of aggravated offenders as a result of dangerous crimes. These four views have different degrees of defects, need to be re-recognized. By combing the related theoretical basis such as the mutual exclusion of the form of crime cessation, the definition of accomplished dangerous crime, the conditions for the establishment of the crime suspension, the relationship between the dangerous crime and the corresponding real crime, it can be seen that the qualitative problem of automatic release of the dangerous state can be seen. The theory of accomplishment of dangerous criminals is still more reasonable. Whether it is the automatic release of the specific dangerous state or the automatic lifting of the abstract dangerous state, there is no material difference qualitatively, as long as the statutory dangerous state has already appeared, After the event, the perpetrator should take active measures to relieve the dangerous state and prevent the result of actual harm from occurring, which should be regarded as the accomplishment of the dangerous crime, among which special attention should be paid to the accurate judgment of the concrete dangerous state and the abstract dangerous state.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914
本文编号：2426044
[Abstract]:Automatic release from danger refers to the legal dangerous state in which the act of harmfulness carried out by the actor is sufficient to cause the actual harm to occur, and fully conforms to the constitution of the crime specified in the special provisions of the criminal law, but before the actual harm result occurs, Under the control of his own subjective will, the actor takes active measures to relieve the dangerous state, so that the actual harm result does not happen in the end. It has three characteristics: time specificity, automatism and validity. It can be divided into two types: automatic release of specific danger state and automatic release of abstract dangerous state. At present, there are four viewpoints in the criminal law theorists on the nature of the situation of automatic release of dangerous state, namely, the theory of the completion of dangerous criminals, the theory of suspension of actual offenders and the theory of suspension of aggravated offenders as a result of dangerous crimes. These four views have different degrees of defects, need to be re-recognized. By combing the related theoretical basis such as the mutual exclusion of the form of crime cessation, the definition of accomplished dangerous crime, the conditions for the establishment of the crime suspension, the relationship between the dangerous crime and the corresponding real crime, it can be seen that the qualitative problem of automatic release of the dangerous state can be seen. The theory of accomplishment of dangerous criminals is still more reasonable. Whether it is the automatic release of the specific dangerous state or the automatic lifting of the abstract dangerous state, there is no material difference qualitatively, as long as the statutory dangerous state has already appeared, After the event, the perpetrator should take active measures to relieve the dangerous state and prevent the result of actual harm from occurring, which should be regarded as the accomplishment of the dangerous crime, among which special attention should be paid to the accurate judgment of the concrete dangerous state and the abstract dangerous state.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鲜铁可;论危险犯概念与特征[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1995年04期
2 苏彩霞;危险犯及其相关概念之辨析——兼评刑法分则第116条与第119条第1款之关系[J];法学评论;2001年03期
3 林亚刚;论犯罪中止的若干争议问题[J];法学评论;2003年06期
4 高巍;;论危险犯的未遂[J];法学评论;2010年01期
5 冯亚东,胡东飞;犯罪既遂标准新论——以刑法目的为视角的剖析[J];法学;2002年09期
6 王志祥,吴占英;危险犯犯罪形态之辨正[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2003年04期
7 舒洪水;;危险犯中危险状态的判断[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年05期
8 付立庆;;应否允许抽象危险犯反证问题研究[J];法商研究;2013年06期
9 马松建;论危险犯的危险[J];河北法学;2001年04期
10 钊作俊;略论危险状态在危险犯中的地位和作用[J];河北法学;2003年03期
本文编号：2426044
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2426044.html
