过度增设罪名乱象的反思与应对
[Abstract]:The reasons and motivation of criminalization all come from the needs of social development, the rapid development of society, the increase of social contradictions, the impact of the original social relations and people's values, and the social security situation in the social transformation period. It is necessary for criminal legislation to be criminalized because of the crime in the new field and the aggravation of all kinds of contradictions. However, such criminalized legislation must be controlled, progressive and scientifically democratized. We must vigorously carry out the idea of ruling the country according to law, strictly control the legislative process, and guide the people to the establishment of academic principles and then to the formulation of laws and regulations, which must be scientific and reasonable and all-encompassing. However, in the actual criminal legislation, there are often mistakes in a certain link, which indirectly leads to improper legislation. The purpose of this paper is to study the legislative chaos caused by excessive addition of charges due to improper legislation. First of all, this article directly from the nine amendments to criminal law excessive additional charges, sorting out, pointed out in the legislative process of the existence of unscientific, unreasonable phenomenon; Secondly, it analyzes the causes of the excessive addition of charges from the concept and procedure. Furthermore, it expounds the harm of this kind of improper legislation to the whole criminal law system, such as the reduction of the authority of criminal law, the unbalanced allocation of judicial resources and the instability of returning to society after a large number of criminals have completed their sentences. Finally, the paper puts forward a solution to the excessive addition of charges mentioned in this paper, that is, to clarify the basic principle of adding charges and to optimize the public opinion mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵秉志;;中国刑法最新修正宏观争议问题研讨[J];学术界;2017年01期
2 高铭暄;李彦峰;;《刑法修正案(九)》立法理念探寻与评析[J];法治研究;2016年02期
3 周光权;;转型时期刑法立法的思路与方法[J];中国社会科学;2016年03期
4 熊永明;;我国罪名建言热潮之隐忧及其批判[J];法学评论;2015年06期
5 赵秉志;刘志伟;袁彬;;关于《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》新增及修改罪名的意见[J];法学杂志;2015年10期
6 杨柳;;释法抑或造法:由刑法历次修正引发的思考[J];中国法学;2015年05期
7 熊永明;;建言增设新罪现象的反思[J];法学论坛;2015年03期
8 卢建平;;犯罪门槛下降及其对刑法体系的挑战[J];法学评论;2014年06期
9 刘强;;我国适当扩大犯罪圈的必要性及思路[J];青少年犯罪问题;2014年05期
10 李琳;;新型危害行为入罪标准之确定——以质疑“毒驾入刑”为视角之分析[J];法学评论;2014年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 陶长春;网络谣言对民意的表达与歪曲[D];武汉大学;2014年
2 杨维林;经济犯罪的法律规制[D];吉林大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 李敏;宽严相济刑事政策下刑法入罪标准研究[D];贵州大学;2015年
2 张辰斌;社会转型与犯罪化[D];山西大学;2013年
3 刘华;刑法修正问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
4 陈瑶;我国刑法修正案中的犯罪化问题研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
5 梁娟;刑法修正案研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
6 谢佳红;犯罪圈的划定与文化变迁[D];中南民族大学;2009年
7 叶青;解读刑法中的社会危害性理论[D];西南政法大学;2009年
8 陈坦松;论刑法的最后手段性[D];华东政法学院;2004年
,本文编号:2455513
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2455513.html