“终身禁止”类行政处罚研究
发布时间:2018-01-22 04:45
本文关键词: 终身禁止 行政处罚 类型化 出处:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:面对纷繁复杂的执法环境,执法者创制着各种新型的政府规制手段,终身禁止便作为其中之一进入了我们的视野。在以《道路交通法》《娱乐场所管理条例》《教师法》等为代表,涉及公共安全、行业秩序、资格管理等的不同领域,均有“终身禁止”类规定的身影。从日益增多的终身禁驾、终身禁足、终身禁考处罚中,行政机关对于该类行政手段的认可度可见一斑。固然,终身禁止在关乎国民生命安全、行业秩序之维护等高危领域,将重大违法行为者彻底拒之门外、斩断再行违法之可能性,起着无可比拟的作用。然而,法律依据的缺位、形式要件的粗糙及程序规定的欠缺,,均暴露了该治理手段在立法和实践层面的混乱。笔者将存在该类规定的现行法律规范,以所欲保护的法益为依据进行梳理。进而尽可能对当下不同形式的终身禁止处罚予以分门别类,与此同时对当下学界与司法界传统的行政处罚种类提出了质疑,并提出了自己的分类。文中,笔者从宪法职业自由的角度出发,阐释了终身禁止手段的不当运用将会对公民的基本宪法权利造成何等严重的损害。最终,回归到法律控制面向,呼吁从实体、程序两方面对该手段予以有效、审慎的规制。
[Abstract]:Facing the complicated law enforcement environment, law enforcers create a variety of new means of government regulation. As one of them, lifelong prohibition has entered our field of vision. It involves public safety and trade order, as represented by "Road Traffic Law", "regulations on the Management of Entertainment places", "teacher's Law" and so on. Qualifications management in different areas, there are "lifelong prohibition" of the type of figure. From the increasing lifetime ban, lifelong ban, lifelong ban on punishment. The recognition of this kind of administrative means can be seen in the administrative organs. Of course, lifelong prohibition in high-risk areas, such as the safety of the national life, the maintenance of trade order, will completely shut out the major illegal acts. The possibility of breaking the law again plays an unparalleled role. However, the absence of legal basis, the roughness of formal elements and the lack of procedural provisions. This means of governance in the legislative and practical level of confusion. The author will have this kind of provisions of the existing legal norms. In order to protect the legal interests as the basis for combing, and then as far as possible to the current forms of life-long prohibition punishment to be classified into categories, at the same time the academic and judicial circles of the current traditional types of administrative penalties have been questioned. And put forward their own classification. In this paper, the author from the perspective of constitutional freedom of occupation, explained how the improper use of life-long prohibition means will cause serious damage to the basic constitutional rights of citizens. Finally. Returning to legal control, it calls for effective and prudent regulation of this method from substantive and procedural aspects.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 欧阳海燕;;2011中国人信用大调查:诚信危机刺痛中国[J];小康;2011年08期
2 徐海燕;;公共利益与拆迁补偿:从重庆最牛“钉子户”案看《物权法》第42条的解释[J];法学评论;2007年04期
3 石佑启;行政听证笔录的法律效力分析[J];法学;2004年04期
4 朱芒;行政处罚听证制度的功能——以上海听证制度的实施现状为例[J];法学研究;2003年05期
5 胡建淼;"其他行政处罚"若干问题研究[J];法学研究;2005年01期
6 万毅,林喜芬;从“无理”的判决到判决书“说理”——判决书说理制度的正当性分析[J];法学论坛;2004年05期
7 章志远;鲍燕娇;;公布违法事实的法律属性分析[J];山东警察学院学报;2011年06期
8 张学慧;谭红;游文丽;;论选择职业自由[J];同济大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
9 孔庆晶;李海平;;我国行政听证制度之探析[J];中国市场;2011年44期
10 杨登峰;;越权立法的认定与处理[J];现代法学;2006年03期
本文编号:1453708
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1453708.html