“红头文件”的可诉性研究

发布时间：2018-01-29 15:00

本文关键词： “红头文件” 抽象行政行为可诉性制度构想　出处：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：虽然随着国家法制建设,行政立法也在不断的完善,但仍然不能满足经济社会发展的需要,“红头文件”在某种程度上补充了行政立法滞后于社会发展的不足,其以“准法律”的角色在行政管理社会生活当中发挥着积极有效的作用。但是,由于司法监督一直处于空白状态,而“红头文件"的制定和管理也没有一个统一的制度和相关的监督审查机制,从而使得制定的“红头文件”混乱无章甚至违法违规,致使“红头文件”走上畸形发展之路。为了更好地保护公民的合法权益,及时有效的给予司法救济,对“红头文件"的司法监督势在必行。虽然抽象行政行为整体可诉还有待商榷,但是将抽象行政行为当中表现最为突出的“红头文件”率先纳入到行政诉讼范围内,让法律规制“红头文件"制定管理的乱象,并在“红头文件"侵犯到利害关系人权益的时候给予及时有效的司法救济。更深层次的讲,“红头文件”的可诉性不突破,抽象行政行为的可诉即无从谈起,依法行政、依法治国就更是无稽之谈。本文内容主要分为五大部分：第一部分为绪论,主要交代选题的背景以及研究意义以及国内对“红头文件”和抽象行政行为的研究现状和发展方向,明确研究目的、理清研究思路；第二部分主要对“红头文件”的基本概念、历史渊源、发展现状、性质内涵等进行细致的论述,以及对“红头文件”的上位概念抽象行政行为做简要概述并理清“红头文件”与抽象行政行为之间的关系,以求对“红头文件"有一个更为全面的认识和理解,同时提出在“红头文件"规范化过程当中众多监督审查中的司法审查,进一步缩小范围,以求细致深刻,为下文论述做好铺垫；第三部分由第二部分的对“红头文件"的司法审查引入,引出其可诉的必要性和可行性,并详加论述；第四部分主要从域外相关制度的研究与借鉴,结合抽象行政行为可诉性理论进程,为下文的制度构想提供理论和实践的基础；第五部分的主要论述“红头文件”作为抽象行政行为纳入行政诉讼范围后,以受案范围与管辖、当事人、证据与举证责任、裁判与执行以及责任追究与救济为代表的一些制度构想。
[Abstract]:Although with the construction of the national legal system, the administrative legislation is constantly improving, but still can not meet the needs of economic and social development, "Red document" to some extent complements the administrative legislation lagging behind the social development of the insufficiency. It plays an active and effective role in the social life of administration with the role of "quasi-law". However, judicial supervision has been in a blank state. However, the formulation and management of "red head document" also does not have a unified system and relevant supervision and examination mechanism, thus making the "red head document" in confusion and no chapter or even violating the law. In order to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, timely and effective judicial relief is given. The judicial supervision of "red head document" is imperative. Although the abstract administrative act can be sued as a whole, it is still open to question. However, the most outstanding "red head document", which is the most outstanding in abstract administrative act, is brought into the scope of administrative litigation first, and the disorder of "red head document" formulation and management is regulated by law. And in the "redhead document" infringement of the rights and interests of interested parties to give timely and effective judicial relief. Further, the "redhead document" can not break through the actionable, abstract administrative action can not be heard. Administration by law, the rule of law is nonsense. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is an introduction. It mainly explains the background and significance of the topic, the present situation and development direction of the domestic research on "red head document" and abstract administrative behavior, clarifies the purpose of the research, and clarifies the research ideas. The second part mainly discusses the basic concept, historical origin, development status, nature connotation and so on of "Red head document". As well as a brief summary of the upper concept of "red head document" abstract administrative behavior and clarify the relationship between "red head document" and abstract administrative act, in order to have a more comprehensive understanding and understanding of "red head document". At the same time, the author puts forward the judicial review in the process of standardization of "red head document", which can further narrow down the scope, in order to be careful and profound, and pave the way for the following discussion; The third part is introduced by the second part of the judicial review of "Red head document", leading to the necessity and feasibility of its actionable, and discussed in detail. The 4th part mainly from the extraterritorial relevant system research and the reference, unifies the abstract administrative action litigability theory process, provides the theory and the practice foundation for the following system idea; Part 5th mainly discusses the "red head document" as an abstract administrative act into the scope of administrative proceedings, to accept the scope and jurisdiction of the case, the parties, evidence and burden of proof. Judgment and enforcement, as well as accountability and relief represented by some system ideas.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】