从经验回归逻辑:请求权理论在行政法中的扬弃——从最高人民法院第69号指导案例楔入

发布时间：2018-01-29 16:33

本文关键词： 请求权理论私法依赖公法权利行政法体系逻辑构造　出处：《江苏行政学院学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：基础权利与请求权——对应的传统请求权逻辑和单纯的经验判断模式,在行政法中存在重大缺陷。其原因在于,发轫于私法体系的传统请求权理论是一种分割公、私法请求权的历史发展结果。这种请求权理论虽然在私法体系中居于枢纽地位,但也极度依赖私法体系的规范环境。行政法律规范的义务主导性,义务、权利之不可互推性,以及合法利益与公法权利之间的非对应性,均决定了传统请求权理论在行政法领域的水土不服。一种适合行政法领域的请求权理论必须能够超越行政法律规范中的义务之局限,充分借助现有衍生公法权利及其请求权对利益的既有评价与权衡,即一种回归精致逻辑又能够满足行政法特殊性的请求权理论。
[Abstract]:The basic right and the right of claim, corresponding to the traditional logic of the right of claim and the simple mode of empirical judgment, have great defects in the administrative law. The traditional claim theory, which originated in the private law system, is the result of the historical development of the division of public and private law claims, although the theory of claim rights occupies a pivotal position in the private law system. But it also relies heavily on the normative environment of the private law system, the obligations of the administrative legal norms, the inextricable nature of the obligations and rights, and the non-correspondence between the legitimate interests and the rights of public law. The traditional claim theory in the field of administrative law is difficult to accept. A claim theory suitable for the field of administrative law must be able to exceed the limitations of the obligations in the administrative law norms. With the full use of the existing derivative public law rights and their claims to the existing evaluation and balance of interests, that is, a return to refined logic and can meet the particularity of administrative law claim theory.
【作者单位】：浙江大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“加快建设法治政府的空间与路径研究”(14ZDC012) 国家“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.1
【正文快照】： 1清晰表达这一构造的相关论述参见徐以祥:《行政法上请求权的理论构造》,载于《法学研究》2010年第6期。2See Clarke v.Securities Industry Association,479U.S.388(1987);R v.Inland Revenue Commissioner,ex parte Self-Employed andSamall Businesses Ltd[1982](AC 617 at

【相似文献】