当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

质监执法行政处罚自由裁量权控制研究

发布时间:2018-02-01 07:48

  本文关键词: 质量技术监督 行政执法 自由裁量权 控制 出处:《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:近年来,假冒伪劣等产品质量违法行为层出不穷,虽经严厉打击,但仍然如百足之虫死而不僵,产品质量违法行为在国际上严重影响国家形象,在国内给人民群众带来人身或财产损失,同时也严重扰乱了社会经济秩序。质量技术监督部门作为生产领域产品质量安全的监管部门,肩负着从源头查处产品质量违法行为的重要使命,行使着法律赋予的对产品质量违法行为进行处罚的行政权力。因此,行政处罚权构成质量技术监督部门行政执法权的核心内容。更为重要的是,行政处罚自由裁量权的合理运用有利于提高行政效率,体现具体行政行为的合理性,但如果不当行使又会极大损害行政相对人的合法权益,滋生腐败,甚至影响国家的长治久安。 一直以来对行政处罚自由裁量权的研究都是行政法学界的重要课题之一,质量技术监督部门作为从源头查处产品质量违法行为主要部门,行政处罚自由裁量权的行使贯穿于其工作的始终,笔者作为一名长期在质量技术监督工作一线从事行政执法的工作人员,深刻体会到正确行使自由裁量权对质量技术监督部门有效履行执法职能的积极意义和不合理行使自由裁量权的危害。基于此,笔者拟结合在工作中查处行政违法行为的实际案例,从立法方面、程序方面、法律应用方面以及质监部门内部职能架构方面就质监部门查处产品质量违法行为过程中行使行政处罚自由裁量权提出自己的观点和看法。
[Abstract]:In recent years, fake and shoddy and other product quality violations emerge one after another, although through severe punishment, but still like a hundred foot worm death and not stiff, product quality violations in the international seriously affect the image of the country. At the same time, it has seriously disturbed the social and economic order. The quality and technical supervision department is the supervision department of product quality and safety in the field of production. Shoulder from the source of the product quality violations of the important mission, exercise the law to punish the product quality violations of the administrative power. The administrative punishment power constitutes the core content of the administrative law enforcement power of the quality and technical supervision department. More importantly, the rational application of the administrative penalty discretion is conducive to improving the administrative efficiency and reflecting the rationality of the specific administrative behavior. However, improper exercise will greatly damage the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, breed corruption, and even affect the long-term stability of the country. All along, the research on the discretion of administrative punishment is one of the important topics in the field of administrative law. The quality and technical supervision department is the main department to investigate and deal with the illegal acts of product quality from the source. The exercise of the discretion of administrative punishment throughout its work, the author as a long-term quality and technical supervision in the first line of administrative law enforcement staff. Deeply understand the positive significance of the correct exercise of discretion to the quality and technical supervision departments to effectively perform the law enforcement function and the harm of unreasonable exercise of discretion. Based on this. The author intends to investigate and deal with the actual cases of administrative illegal acts in the work, from the legislative aspects, procedural aspects. In the aspect of law application and internal functional structure of quality supervision department, the author puts forward his own views and opinions on exercising the discretion of administrative punishment in the process of investigating and punishing illegal acts of product quality by quality supervision department.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 胡亚球,陈迎;论行政自由裁量权的司法控制[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2001年04期

2 肖玲莉;;论对我国行政自由裁量权法律控制的路径[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2009年08期

3 姜明安;;论行政自由裁量权及其法律控制[J];法学研究;1993年01期

4 余凌云;;游走在规范与僵化之间——对金华行政裁量基准实践的思考[J];清华法学;2008年03期

5 余凌云;;对行政裁量立法控制的疲软——一个实例的验证[J];法学论坛;2009年05期

6 赵永行;行政权力运行与行政程序[J];现代法学;1999年03期

7 于丽平;穆丽霞;;探究行政自由裁量权[J];行政法学研究;2007年02期

8 周佑勇;;裁量基准的正当性问题研究[J];中国法学;2007年06期



本文编号:1481347

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1481347.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户55c2d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com