交通事故责任认定行为的可诉性研究

发布时间：2018-02-22 13:59

  本文关键词： 交通事故责任认定 可诉性 具体行政行为 受案范围　出处：《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：如今交通事故已经成为造成人类非正常死亡的重要原因之一,交通事故不仅给国家和人民造成严重损失,也给许多家庭带来了痛苦和不幸,而且影响着社会的稳定。正常的交通秩序遭到破坏,使得交通运输受阻,从而影着国民经济持续健康发展。因此如何妥善处理交通事故问题成了全社会关注的热点问题。 根据现行法律的相关规定,目前交通事故责任认定行为在我国司法实践中不具有可诉性。公安机关交通管理部门对事故现场勘验、检查后出具的交通事故认定书在诉讼中作为证据使用。当事人对交通事故责任认定行为不服只能向上一级公安机关交通管理部门申请重新鉴定,除此之外没有其他救济途径。支持交通事故责任认定行为不具有可诉性的观点认为：交通事故责任认定行为只是一种中间性行政行为,或者说是一种不会直接涉及到当事人利益的行政确认行为。但事实上,交通事故责任认定是对交通事故现场处置以及事故调查的综合分析,而且与由交通事故产生的民事责任、行政责任甚至是刑事责任都有直接关系。在这种涉及当事人权利义务的情形之下,实践中却不能给予合法有效的制度保障,与行政法保障公民权益的理念不相符,与当前我国立法精神相违背。 本文共分为五个部分。第一部分主要对交通事故责任认定行为的相关概念和基本情况作简要分析。第二部分在划分行政行为的基础上详细论述具体行政行为的属性,并将交通事故责任认定行为放在具体行政行为的概念下进行比较分析得出交通事故责任认定行为属于具体行政行为而非所谓的证据行为的结论,奠定交通事故责任认定行为可诉性的基础。第三部分通过分析行政诉讼法受案范围以及受案范围的确定标准,指出交通事故责任认定行为会直接涉及到事故当事人的利益,因此必须将其纳入行政诉讼受案范围内。在第三部分,笔者详细论述了交通事故责任认定行为如何让影响事故当事人的民事、行政和刑事责任。第四部分通过分析对交通事故责任认定不服时救济方式的不完善这一现实问题,来说明通过法律规定的方式确认交通事故责任认定行为可诉性的必要性。第五部分对可诉性实现途径的阐述,论证明确交通事故责任认定行为可诉性可行性与必要性。
[Abstract]:Today, traffic accidents have become one of the important causes of human deaths. Traffic accidents not only cause serious losses to the country and people, but also bring pain and misfortune to many families. It also affects the stability of the society, the normal traffic order is destroyed, the traffic transportation is blocked, and the national economy continues to develop healthily, so how to deal with the traffic accident problem properly has become a hot issue that the whole society pays close attention to. According to the relevant provisions of the current law, at present, the cognizance of traffic accident liability is not actionable in the judicial practice of our country. The traffic management department of the public security organ conducts an investigation on the scene of the accident. The traffic accident cognizance document issued after inspection is used as evidence in the lawsuit. The parties who are not satisfied with the act of determining the responsibility of the traffic accident can only apply for a new appraisal by the traffic administrative department of the public security organ at the next higher level. In addition, there is no other way of relief. The view that supporting the identification of traffic accident liability is not actionable is that the identification of traffic accident liability is only a kind of intermediate administrative act. Or it is an act of administrative confirmation that does not directly involve the interests of the parties concerned. But in fact, the determination of traffic accident liability is a comprehensive analysis of the disposal of the traffic accident site and the investigation of the accident, and it is also related to the civil liability arising from the traffic accident. There is a direct relationship between administrative liability and even criminal liability. In this case involving the rights and obligations of the parties concerned, the legal and effective system protection cannot be given in practice, which is inconsistent with the idea of protecting the rights and interests of citizens in administrative law. Against the spirit of our current legislation. This article is divided into five parts. The first part mainly analyzes the related concepts and basic situation of the traffic accident responsibility cognizance behavior. The second part discusses the attribute of the concrete administrative act in detail on the basis of dividing the administrative act. The conclusion that the identification of traffic accident responsibility belongs to the specific administrative act rather than the so-called evidential behavior is compared and analyzed under the concept of the specific administrative act, and the conclusion is drawn that the traffic accident responsibility cognizance act belongs to the specific administrative act rather than the so-called evidential act. The third part points out that the identification of responsibility for traffic accidents will directly involve the interests of the parties concerned by analyzing the scope of the cases and the criteria for determining the scope of the cases. Therefore, it must be brought into the scope of administrative litigation cases. In the third part, the author discusses in detail how the act of determining the responsibility of traffic accidents can affect the civil affairs of the parties involved in the accident. Administrative and criminal liability. Part 4th through the analysis of the actual problem of the imperfection of relief methods when the responsibility for traffic accidents is found to be dissatisfied, To explain the necessity of confirming the actionable behavior of traffic accident liability by means of law. Part 5th expounds the way of realizing actionable responsibility and demonstrates the feasibility and necessity of confirming the actionable behavior of traffic accident responsibility.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3;D922.14
，

本文编号：1524575