治安调解适用中的裁量问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-01 19:21

本文关键词： 治安调解行政裁量要件裁量效果裁量请求权自我规制　出处：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：治安调解是公安机关办理治安案件的重要方式,可以有效地化解社会矛盾与增进社会的和谐,将行政裁量理论引入治安调解适用领域,有助于规范治安调解的适用。在要件裁量方面,通过对"符合治安调解的案件范围""情节较轻的"和"当事人自愿接受治安调解"等要素的精细化解读,有助于更好地理解治安调解的法定事实要件。在效果裁量方面,通过梳理变迁中治安调解制度的功能取向和对"可以"一词的解读,能够确定一种"优先适用"的裁量路径。公安机关适用治安调解可以为当事人带来反射性的利益,当事人虽然享有请求调解的权利,但不得就裁量瑕疵寻求司法的救济。为了促进治安调解适用裁量的合理化,应当建立与完善行政规则、指导案例和考核评价等制度,实现有效的行政自我规制。
[Abstract]:Public security mediation is an important way for public security organs to handle public security cases. It can effectively resolve social contradictions and promote social harmony. Administrative discretion theory is introduced into the applicable field of public security mediation. It is helpful to standardize the application of public security mediation. In the aspect of the elements' discretion, through the careful interpretation of the elements such as "the scope of the cases in accordance with the public security mediation" and "the lighter circumstances" and "the parties voluntarily accept the public security mediation" and so on, It is helpful to better understand the legal factual elements of public security mediation. In the aspect of effect discretion, through combing the function orientation of the public security mediation system and the interpretation of the word "can" in the vicissitude, To be able to determine a discretionary path of "preferential application". The application of public security mediation by public security organs can bring reflexive benefits to the parties, although the parties enjoy the right to request mediation, In order to promote the rationalization of the applicable discretion of public security mediation, we should establish and perfect the administrative rules, guide the cases and assess the system, and realize effective administrative self-regulation.
【作者单位】：中国人民公安大学;
【基金】：北京市法学会2015年市级法学研究课题青年项目“北京市建立行政执法案例指导制度研究”(BLS[2015]C003)
【分类号】：D922.14

【相似文献】