论我国行政复议程序的不足与完善

发布时间：2018-03-22 00:25

本文选题：程序完善　切入点：行政复议程序　出处：《内蒙古大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国现代行政复议制度是伴随着当代民主政治的成长进步而制定的,由行政复议机关自身扮演化解行政纠纷的角色,不断增强行政机关自我监督、自我纠错的功能,为行政相对人寻求行政救济增添了一种行之有效的法律途径。自1990年国务院颁布实施《行政复议条例》,1999年又颁布了《行政复议法》,后于2000年又颁布了《行政复议法实施条例》,我国行政复议制度已经施行有二十多年,行政复议系统已在全国范围内普遍建立,其在保障行政申请人的合法权益、监管行政权力的合法施行方面做出了重要的贡献。由此可见,行政复议制度已经成为化解行政纠纷的重要机制,然而其在实践过程中也存在许多问题和缺陷。由于我国行政复议制度在立法过程中过于注重行政复议程序的行政化、非司法化,导致在行政复议程序上过于简略,缺失了程序的公正、理性要素,使得行政复议制度功能的发挥极为有限,要想充分发挥行政复议制度在化解行政纠纷中的优越性,对我国现行《行政复议法》进行修改就迫在眉睫了,当行政复议制度面临着改革,其程序的改革必然是改革的重中之重。通过本文的阐述,笔者对我国现行行政复议程序在实践过程中出现的问题及原因进一步深度剖析,并对如何完善我国行政复议程序提出了较为全面合理的思考和对策。本文分为五部分。第一部分简略陈述了我国行政复议程序的概念特征,其在程序的设置上没有脱离行政行为的范畴,带有典型的行政行为特征。第二部分详细介绍了我国行政复议制度在程序上表现出的突出问题及原因。第三部分以英国的行政裁判所裁判程序及美国的行政法官听证制度为例对英美法系国家行政复议程序进行了简要介绍,以德国的异议程序及法国的行政救济程序为例对大陆法系国家行政复议程序进行了简要介绍,对我国台湾地区则是介绍其行政诉愿程序。寄望借助于这些国家和地区相对完善的行政救济程序制度并结合我国当前国情,引发对我国该制度改革的有益思考,为我国行政复议程序的完善提供新的思路。第四部分笔者以美国较完善的行政法官听证制度为突破点,结合有准司法性特征的多种制度改革,就完善我国行政复议程序提出了一些具体的思路。
[Abstract]:The modern administrative reconsideration system of our country is established along with the development and progress of contemporary democratic politics. The administrative reconsideration organs themselves play the role of resolving administrative disputes and constantly strengthen the functions of self-supervision and self-correction of administrative organs. From 1990, the State Council promulgated the regulations on Administrative Review, then in 1999, the Administrative Review Law was promulgated, and then in 2000, the Administrative Review Act was promulgated. The Administrative reconsideration system in China has been in force for more than 20 years. The administrative review system has been widely established throughout the country. It has made important contributions in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of administrative applicants and supervising the lawful implementation of administrative powers. Administrative reconsideration system has become an important mechanism to resolve administrative disputes, but it also has many problems and defects in practice. As a result of non-judicialization, the procedure of administrative reconsideration is too brief, and the fair and rational elements of the procedure are missing, which makes the function of the administrative reconsideration system extremely limited. If we want to give full play to the superiority of the administrative reconsideration system in resolving administrative disputes, It is urgent to amend the present Administrative Review Law. When the administrative reconsideration system is facing the reform, the reform of its procedure must be the most important part of the reform. The author further analyzes the problems and causes of the current administrative review procedure in our country in the course of practice. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part briefly states the conceptual characteristics of administrative review procedure in China. It does not deviate from the category of administrative act in setting up the procedure, The second part introduces in detail the prominent problems and reasons of the administrative review system in our country. The third part is based on the administrative adjudication procedure in Britain and the administrative judges in the United states. As an example, the hearing system briefly introduces the procedure of administrative review in common law countries. Taking the objection procedure of Germany and the administrative relief procedure of France as an example, this paper briefly introduces the procedure of administrative review in civil law countries. To the Taiwan area of our country, it is to introduce its administrative appeal procedure. We hope that with the help of the relatively perfect administrative relief procedure system of these countries and regions and the current situation of our country, it will lead to beneficial thinking on the reform of this system in our country. In the fourth part, the author takes the more perfect hearing system of the administrative judge in America as the breakthrough point and combines with the reform of various systems with quasi-judicial characteristics. This paper puts forward some concrete ideas to perfect the procedure of administrative review in our country.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】