我国《学校教育法》为何难以制定
发布时间:2018-04-17 06:31
本文选题:《学校教育法》 + 法律体系 ; 参考:《中国教育学刊》2017年10期
【摘要】:《学校教育法》是关乎所有学校及学校事业的实体法。由于我国长期以来在认识层面存在理解误区,加上地区差异性大以及没有很好厘清《学校教育法》与其他教育法律之间的关系等原因,国家层面的《学校教育法》迟迟未能出台,由此不仅造成了国家教育法律体系的严重失衡、教育微观层面多方关系的权责不清、学校内部治理的无法可依,同时也造成了学生本应享有的基本权益被隐性掩盖等诸多问题与弊端的出现。通过对呼吁立法的现实状况进行梳理,提出《学校教育法》的制定应明确各级各类学校的性质、界定校长的法律授权内容与职权范围的边界、明晰教师权责的边界和学生的合法权益、明确学校办学经费的成本核算和划拨细则以及对各级各类学校的制度建设和建筑标准予以严格规范等具体立法建议与举措。
[Abstract]:The School Education Act is the substantive law concerning all schools and school undertakings.For a long time in our country, there are some misunderstandings on the understanding level, and there are many regional differences, and the relationship between the School Education Law and other educational laws has not been well clarified, and so on.The delay in the enactment of the National School Education Law has not only resulted in a serious imbalance in the national education legal system, the unclear powers and responsibilities of the multi-party relations at the micro level of education, and the inability to follow the internal governance of the school.At the same time, it also causes many problems and malpractices, such as the hidden hiding of the basic rights and interests that students should enjoy.Through combing the reality of the appeal legislation, it is proposed that the establishment of the School Education Law should clarify the nature of all kinds of schools at all levels, and define the content of the principal's legal authorization and the boundary between the terms of reference,This paper clarifies the boundary of teachers' rights and responsibilities and the legitimate rights and interests of students, clarifies the rules of cost accounting and allocation of school funds, and strictly standardizes the system construction and building standards of schools at all levels and all kinds of schools, and so on.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学法学院;华东师范大学教育学部;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金教育学重点课题“中国终身教育体系构建的路径与机制研究”(项目编号:AKA150013)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】:D922.16
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 黄欣;;我国《学校教育法》制订的现状与展望[J];华东师范大学学报(教育科学版);2012年03期
2 吴遵民;黄欣;周翠萍;;汶川地震拷问我国《学校教育法》的缺失[J];教育理论与实践;2008年34期
3 沈重;;日本学校教育法(续)[J];国外法学;1983年04期
4 何玉荣;李永春;;浅析学校教育法治化的困境与对策[J];科技致富向导;2012年21期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 陈培雅;中小学校教育法治化的困境与对策研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
,本文编号:1762460
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1762460.html