少数民族差别性权利的正当性:理论基础与范式

发布时间：2018-05-19 00:33

  本文选题：少数民族 + 差别性权利　； 参考：《民族研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：差别性少数民族权利的正当性问题一直是困扰各国理论工作者与实践者的重大议题。基于学界既有的理论探索和世界民族政治实践,本文概括出五种有关少数民族差别性权利正当性的理论基础与范式,即弱势地位理论范式、道德理论范式、公共性理论范式、历史性权利理论范式以及补偿-激励理论范式。其中前三个理论范式更为流行更为重要,后两个理论范式则是补充性的。这些权利来源理论范式各有其条件、解释强项与解释力不足之处,它们(特别是前三个理论范式)不是单一的自我证成的理论假定,而是嵌入到自由主义、社群主义、社会主义和民族主义等意识形态和理论主张之中,从而呈现出规范性论证与经验性论证相结合,以及意识形态的价值判断与现实主义的权力政治逻辑相结合的特质。
[Abstract]:The legitimacy of the rights of different ethnic minorities has always been a major issue that plagued the theoretical workers and practitioners of all countries. Based on the theoretical exploration and the practice of the world's national politics, this paper summarizes five theoretical foundations and paradigms about the justifiable rights of minority nationalities, namely, the theoretical paradigm of the disadvantaged position, and the moral theory. Paradigm, public theory paradigm, historical right theory paradigm and compensation incentive theory paradigm. The first three theoretical paradigms are more popular and more important, and the latter two theories are complementary. These theories have their own conditions to explain the strengths and weaknesses of the explanatory power, especially the first three theory models. Rather than a single theoretical hypothesis of self evidence, it is embedded in ideologies and theories, such as liberalism, communitarianism, socialism and nationalism, which presents a combination of normative arguments and empirical arguments, and the combination of ideological value judgment and the power and political logic of realism.
【作者单位】： 中央民族大学中国民族理论与民族政策研究院;
【分类号】：D912.1
，

本文编号：1907929