论我国行政强制执行和解程序制度的完善

发布时间：2018-05-28 01:40

本文选题：行政强制执行 + 和解　；参考：《山西大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年1月1日起实施的《行政强制法》原则性地规定了行政强制执行和解制度,这为学者们对该制度进行研究和创新拓展提供了广阔的空间。从行政控权的角度来说,研究行政强制执行和解程序制度为该制度的广泛应用提供了一套具体的规范和流程,这对于实现行政权的规范和控制具有重要意义；从实现行政管理目标和促进社会和谐的角度看,对行政强制执行和解程序制度中的执行主体与被执行主体的权利义务关系进行研究,进一步完善行政强制执行和解的制度体系,使该制度在行政执法活动中占据一个重要的位置,成为实现行政目的的重要手段,有利于实现双方当事人关系的和谐,最终促进社会和谐。本文运用文本分析法,通过对《行政强制法》第四十二条、相关定义和案例进行分析,介绍了行政强制执行和解及其程序制度；运用比较分析法,通过把行政强制执行和解程序制度与民事诉讼中的强制执行和解程序制度作比较,阐明该制度本身的特征与功能；运用实证分析法,从行政强制执行和解程序制度的参与主体、适用范围、服务实体等基本问题入手,指出行政强制执行和解程序制度存在的问题,并提出相应的对策。本文除引言和结论外,共分为四大部分：第一部分概括介绍了行政强制执行和解程序制度的基本理论,具体包括：概念、特征、功能,并指出了完善我国行政强制执行和解程序制度的必要性和可行性。第二部分是对完善我国行政强制执行和解程序制度理论基础的分析。具体包括：行政权可有限处分性理论、程序正义理论、行政平衡理论和行政契约理论。通过对以上理论进行阐明,提出完善我国行政强制执行和解程序制度的原则性要求。第三部分是对我国目前行政强制执行和解程序制度现状及其问题的介绍。在总结其立法层面现状和实践层面现状的基础上,分析归纳出了我国行政强制执行和解程序制度存在的问题。具体包括：行政强制执行和解程序的适用范围狭窄、参与主体有限、服务实体未明、具体程序缺失和案外人关于执行和解协议的权利缺乏。此外,还对我国行政强制执行和解程序制度的成因作了简要分析。第四部分是对完善我国行政强制执行和解程序制度的建议。该部分首先对与该制度有关的四个基本问题提出了相应的完善建议,进而指出我国应构建行政主体自行强制执行和解和非诉行政强制执行和解两套具体的程序制度。本文的创新之处在于：第一,视角创新：立足于《行政强制法》第四十二条关于行政强制执行和解制度的规定,继而从该条规定延伸到该制度的子制度-—行政强制执行和解程序制度,体现了由面到点的视角分析法。第二,观点创新：提出构建两套具体的行政强制执行和解程序制度体系,即行政主体自行强制执行和解程序制度和非诉行政强制执行和解程序制度。
[Abstract]:The Administrative compulsory Law, which has been implemented since January 1, 2012, stipulates in principle the system of administrative enforcement and reconciliation, which provides a broad space for scholars to study and innovate and expand the system. From the perspective of administrative control, the study of administrative enforcement reconciliation procedure system provides a set of specific norms and processes for the wide application of the system, which is of great significance to the realization of administrative power regulation and control; From the point of view of realizing the goal of administration and promoting social harmony, this paper studies the relationship between the subject of enforcement and the subject of enforcement in the system of administrative enforcement and reconciliation, and further improves the system of administrative enforcement of reconciliation. Make this system occupy an important position in the administrative law enforcement activities, become an important means to achieve administrative purposes, is conducive to the realization of the harmony between the parties, and ultimately promote social harmony. Through the analysis of article 42 of the Administrative compulsory Law and the relevant definitions and cases, this paper introduces the administrative enforcement reconciliation and its procedural system, and applies the comparative analysis method. By comparing the system of administrative enforcement settlement procedure with that of civil procedure, this paper clarifies the characteristics and functions of the system, and applies the empirical analysis method to analyze the main body of the administrative enforcement settlement procedure system. Starting with the basic problems such as the scope of application and the service entity, this paper points out the problems existing in the system of administrative compulsory execution and reconciliation procedure, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the basic theory of the administrative enforcement reconciliation procedure system, including: concept, characteristics, functions, It also points out the necessity and feasibility of perfecting the reconciliation procedure system of administrative enforcement in China. The second part is the analysis of the theoretical basis of perfecting the system of administrative enforcement reconciliation in our country. It includes: the theory of limited disposition of administrative power, the theory of procedural justice, the theory of administrative balance and the theory of administrative contract. By expounding the above theory, the paper puts forward the principle requirements of perfecting the system of administrative compulsory execution and reconciliation in our country. The third part introduces the present situation and problems of the administrative enforcement reconciliation procedure system in our country. On the basis of summing up the present situation of legislation and practice, this paper analyzes and sums up the problems existing in the system of administrative enforcement and reconciliation in our country. It includes: the scope of application of the administrative enforcement settlement procedure is narrow, the main body of participation is limited, the service entity is not clear, the specific procedure is missing and the right of the outsider to implement the settlement agreement is lacking. In addition, the author also briefly analyzes the causes of the administrative enforcement reconciliation procedure system in China. The fourth part is to perfect our country administrative compulsory execution reconciliation procedure system suggestion. In this part, four basic problems related to this system are put forward, and then it is pointed out that China should construct two specific procedural systems of self-enforcement reconciliation and non-litigation administrative enforcement reconciliation. The innovation of this paper lies in: first, the angle of view innovation: based on the "Administrative compulsory Law" Article 42 on the administrative enforcement reconciliation system provisions, Then it extends from the stipulation to the sub-system of the system-the system of administrative compulsory execution and reconciliation procedure, which reflects the analysis from the angle of view from the aspect to the point of view. Second, point of view innovation: put forward to construct two sets of concrete administrative enforcement reconciliation system, namely administrative subject self-enforcement reconciliation procedure system and non-litigation administrative enforcement reconciliation procedure system.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】