界定行政处罚行为的功能性考量路径

发布时间：2018-06-11 14:13

本文选题：争议性行政措施 + 行政处罚　；参考：《法学研究》2015年02期

【摘要】："制裁性"不能成为在个案中界定某种行政措施是否属于行政处罚的标准,因制裁性标准的两个要素,即行政相对人行为的"违法性"和行政措施为相对人施加"额外不利效果",本身并不周全。是否将某种有争议的行政措施视作行政处罚,关联着能否实现相关立法所期待的维护行政相对人的权利和利益、确保依法行政、确保行政管理的有效性、维护法的安定性以及实现程序经济原则等功能。在大体维持形式性界定标准的前提下,将没有必要进入个案的功能要素予以裁减,进而考量各种相冲突的功能的重要性,并借此作出判断,是在个案中界定行政处罚行为的可由之路。在相关判决不断积累的基础上对案件进行类型化处理,能够使此种功能性考量逐步走向理性化。
[Abstract]:"sanctions" cannot be used as a criterion for defining whether a certain administrative measure is an administrative punishment in a case, because of the two elements of the sanction criterion. In other words, the illegality of the administrative counterpart's behavior and the additional adverse effect imposed by the administrative measures on the relative person are not comprehensive in themselves. Whether to regard some controversial administrative measures as administrative punishment is related to whether to realize the rights and interests of administrative counterpart, to ensure administration according to law, and to ensure the effectiveness of administrative management, which is expected by relevant legislation. The stability of the maintenance law and the realization of the principle of procedural economy and other functions. Subject to the general maintenance of the formal definition criteria, the functional elements that do not need to be reduced into the individual case will be reduced to take into account the importance of conflicting functions and to make judgements thereon, It is the road that defines the administrative punishment behavior in the case. On the basis of the accumulation of relevant judgments, this kind of functional consideration can be rationalized step by step.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.11

【参考文献】