“信访权”辨伪

发布时间：2018-06-11 14:15

本文选题：信访权 + 立论依据　；参考：《山东警察学院学报》2017年01期

【摘要】：信访权利论将官方的确认、德国宪法理论、宪法条文的推断、《信访条例》的颁布、"信访洪峰"的存在作为信访权成立的立论依据。但是,新中国成立以来有关信访制度的主要法律文件从未确认"信访权";由于信访的主体是"人民"而非"公民",它并不能成为具有普遍性的公民权利;由宪法条文推断出的是"人民群众通过信访实现民主权利",而非"信访权";《信访条例》是行政法规,不是信访权成立的法律依据;作为结果的"信访洪峰"不能成为作为原因的信访制度权利化的依据。所以,信访权利论的立论依据是不成立的,因而其关于信访权权属性质的主张也是不成立的。信访权利论还面临着信访权客体无法确定、无法处理与相邻权利的关系、不能救济的理论困境和谋利型上访所带来的实践困境。因此,信访并非一种权利,而只是监督权的实现方式。
[Abstract]:The theory of the right to petition calls for the official confirmation, the German constitutional theory, the inference of the constitutional provisions, the promulgation of the letters and visits regulations and the existence of the "letter and visit flood peak" as the basis for the establishment of the right to petition. However, since the founding of the new China, the main legal documents concerning the system of letters and visits have never confirmed the "right of letter and visit"; because the main body of the letter and visit is the "people" rather than the "citizen", It can not be a universal civil rights; it is inferred from the constitutional provisions that "the people realize the democratic rights through letters and visits", not the "right to petition"; the letter and visit Ordinance is an administrative law, not the legal basis for the establishment of the right of letter and visit; the result of the "letter and visit Hong Feng" can not be the basis for the rights of the petition system as a cause. Therefore, the basis of the theory of the right of letter and visit is not established, so its claim on the ownership of the right of petition is not established. The theory of the right of petition is also faced with the undetermination of the object of the right of petition, the relationship between the right and the adjacent rights, the theoretical predicament of the unremedies and the practical plight of the profiteering petition. Right, but only the way to realize the right of supervision.
【作者单位】：山东警察学院法律部;
【基金】：2013年山东省高校人文社科研究计划项目“信访法治化研究”(项目编号:J13WB58)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】