公立学校教师有偿补课的法律规制:美国经验及其对中国的启示

发布时间：2018-06-15 01:26

本文选题：利益冲突 + 有偿补课　；参考：《北京大学教育评论》2017年02期

【摘要】：本文通过考查美国州和地方的政策法规及处分决定,描述和分析美国对公立学校教师从事有偿补课进行法律规制的范围、原理、目的、手段以及相关惩戒制度,发现美国地方政府通常"有条件禁止"教师从事有偿补课。由此,本文主张对公立学校教师从事有偿补课进行法律规制的基础是教师避免利益冲突的义务,这一规制同时需要满足目的合法和手段合理的要求。与美国相比,我国对教师有偿补课行为的规制具有全国性政策但是效力不高、限制范围宽泛并突出规制"有组织"的行为、缺乏对规制目的和手段的细致论证以及重实体轻程序、重惩戒轻预防的特点,本文对此提出了有针对性的改进建议。
[Abstract]:This paper describes and analyzes the scope, principle, purpose, means and relevant disciplinary system of the legal regulation of public school teachers engaging in compensatory supplementary courses in the United States by examining the policies, regulations and disciplinary decisions of the states and localities in the United States. It was found that local governments in the United States often "conditionally prohibit" teachers from engaging in paid supplementary classes. Therefore, this paper argues that the legal regulation of public school teachers engaged in compensatory courses is based on the teachers' obligation to avoid conflicts of interest, and this regulation needs to meet the requirements of legal purpose and reasonable means at the same time. Compared with the United States, our country has a national policy on teachers' compensatory supplementary courses, but the effectiveness is not high, the scope of restrictions is broad and the regulation of "organized" behavior is highlighted. There is a lack of detailed argumentation on the purpose and means of regulation, as well as the characteristics of paying more attention to substance and procedure, to punishment than to prevention. This paper puts forward some suggestions for improvement.
【作者单位】：北京大学教育学院/教育经济研究所;北京外国语大学法学院/中外教育法研究中心;
【基金】：北京市教育科学十二五规划课题(3017-0003)
【分类号】：D922.16;G451

【相似文献】