我国城乡规划行政强制执行法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-06-17 06:13
本文选题:城乡规划 + 行政强制执行 ; 参考:《北京交通大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着我国经济的高速增长,城乡建设步伐的加快,城镇化水平的急速推进,城乡规划作为保障城镇健康有序发展的公共政策,发挥着越来越重要的作用。而与此同时,一些无视规划进行建设活动的行为也变得日益普遍,这些违法建设不仅侵害了公共资源、破坏了社会环境、制约了城乡发展,而且还存在安全隐患,可能危及到人民的生命财产安全,因此需要我们下大力气加以整治。而行政机关在对无视规划的违法建设进行查处,实施行政强制执行权时,却常常是冲突四起、矛盾重重,成为行政执法中的难点,显然面临着不小的问题与挑战。本文基于这样的背景,立足现状,抓住城乡规划行政强制执行这个核心,解析其存在的问题并探索可以完善的路径。 本文主要分为五个部分。第一部分,是对本篇论文基本特征的简介,阐述了论文写作的相关背景、意义以及研究思路。第二部分,首先从城乡规划行政强制执行的概论入手,介绍了行政强制执行的概念和特征,城乡规划行政强制执行的概念、特征以及应当遵循的基本原则。第三部分,主要是梳理城乡规划行政强制执行的相关立法,从立法沿革的角度进行阐述。在立法沿革中,从城乡规划和行政强制两个方面展开,并总结出它们在立法沿革过程中呈现出的特点。第四部分,分析了我国目前城乡规划行政强制执行存在的一些问题,分别从立法、实施机制以及救济的角度进行阐述。立法中的问题主要体现在有关立法规定较为笼统,缺乏可操作性以及地方性法规及规章存在与上位法相冲突的情形。实施机制中的问题主要体现在城乡规划行政强制执行未能严格履行程序、执行主体缺乏协作和监督这两个方面。救济中的问题主要体现在司法和非司法救济缺乏力度。第五部分,作为本文的重要部分,尝试提出一些解决问题的具体建议,这些建议也分别围绕相关的问题:就立法而言要制定统一的配套实施细则、填补法律空缺、规范地方性法规和规章;就实施机制而言要构建严格的法定程序落实机制、充分保证公民在程序中的知情权和参与权,以及比例原则的适用;明确分工加强协作、增设多层次的监督体系;救济中要完善司法救济和非司法救济。 本文试图通过分析为规范城乡规划管理过程中的行政强制执行权,提供一些有效的路径、找到一些可行的解决方案。
[Abstract]:With the rapid economic growth, the acceleration of the pace of urban and rural construction, and the rapid advancement of urbanization, urban and rural planning, as a public policy to ensure the healthy and orderly development of cities and towns, is playing a more and more important role. At the same time, some acts of disregard for planning for construction activities have become increasingly common. These illegal constructions not only encroach on public resources, destroy the social environment, restrict the development of urban and rural areas, but also have hidden security problems. May endanger the people's lives and property safety, so we need to make great efforts to rectify. However, when the administrative organs investigate and deal with the illegal construction in disregard of the planning, the enforcement of administrative enforcement power is often caused by conflicts, which becomes a difficult point in the administration of law enforcement, and obviously faces not small problems and challenges. Based on this background and the present situation, this paper grasps the core of administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning, analyzes its existing problems and explores the path that can be perfected. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is a brief introduction to the basic characteristics of this paper, including its background, significance and research ideas. The second part begins with an overview of administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning, introduces the concept and characteristics of administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning, the concept and characteristics of administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning, and the basic principles to be followed. The third part, mainly combing the relevant legislation of administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning, from the perspective of legislative evolution. In the process of legislative evolution, it starts from the two aspects of urban and rural planning and administrative compulsion, and summarizes their characteristics in the process of legislative evolution. The fourth part analyzes some problems existing in the administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning in China, respectively from the perspective of legislation, implementation mechanism and relief. The main problems in the legislation are the general provisions of the relevant legislation, the lack of maneuverability and the conflict between the local laws and regulations and the superior laws. The problems in the implementation mechanism are mainly reflected in the failure to strictly implement the procedures of the administrative enforcement of urban and rural planning, the lack of coordination and supervision of the executive body. The problems in relief are mainly reflected in the lack of judicial and non-judicial remedies. The fifth part, as an important part of this paper, tries to put forward some concrete suggestions to solve the problem. These suggestions also revolve around the related problems. To standardize local laws and regulations; to establish a strict legal procedure implementation mechanism as far as the implementation mechanism is concerned; to fully guarantee citizens' right to know and participate in the procedure, as well as the application of the principle of proportionality; and to make clear the division of labor and strengthen cooperation. A multi-level supervision system should be established, and judicial and non-judicial remedies should be perfected. This paper attempts to provide some effective paths for standardizing the administrative enforcement power in the process of urban and rural planning and management, and to find some feasible solutions.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.1;D922.297
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 严垠章;;《城乡规划法》第68条规定“责成”行为的法律性质及适用分析[J];法治论坛;2013年04期
2 郝静;;柔性化行政执法:行政强制执行和解制度解析与完善[J];广东行政学院学报;2013年06期
3 王晓滨;;违法建设强制拆除的主体[J];人民司法;2013年15期
4 沈晖;陈瑶;;境外治理违法建筑的经验和启示[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
5 丁晓华;;强制拆除违法建筑行为定性与规范——基于对《行政强制法》第44条的解读[J];法学;2012年10期
6 胡建淼;;“行政强制措施”与“行政强制执行”的分界[J];中国法学;2012年02期
7 祁巍锋;;《村庄和集镇规划建设管理条例》实施评估及建议[J];城市规划;2011年09期
8 王岩;;强制拆除违法建筑案件若干问题探析[J];法律适用;2011年09期
9 刘迎春;;城乡规划的相关法律、依据的问题研究[J];辽宁建材;2010年12期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘鸿;论我国地方城乡规划制定法规的完善[D];安徽大学;2013年
,本文编号:2030025
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2030025.html