国土资源行政复议工作应当坚持政治性、人民性和法治性的有机统一
[Abstract]:The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee pointed out that the administrative reconsideration system should be reformed, the hearing mechanism of administrative reconsideration cases should be perfected, and the illegal or improper administrative behavior should be corrected. Based on the background of promoting industrialization and new urbanization and building a well-off society in an all-round way, this paper systematically discusses that the administrative reconsideration of land and resources should adhere to the organic unity of political, people and rule of law under the new situation. In order to further elucidate the specific connotation of political, people's and rule of law, this paper combines the administrative reconsideration of land and resources with typical cases of land and mineral resources. The author argues that the political nature of administrative reconsideration of land and resources should properly handle the relationship between policy and law, the relationship between administration according to law and reform and innovation, and the relationship between case justice and social justice. It is necessary to correctly understand and deal with the relationship between administrative supervision and safeguarding rights and interests, the relationship between administrative leading and public participation, and the relationship between legitimacy examination and rationality review; To insist on the rule of law in administrative reconsideration work, we should correctly understand and deal with the relationship between procedural justice and substantive justice, the relationship between trial according to law and proper mediation, and the relationship between legal effect and social effect.
【作者单位】: 北京大学地球与空间科学学院;中国土地矿产法律事务中心;
【分类号】:D630;D922.11
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 张康之;论“公共性”及其在公共行政中的实现[J];东南学术;2005年01期
2 蔡晓荣;;法律规范与生活逻辑:失火民事赔偿责任衍进的本土叙事[J];现代法学;2011年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨海坤;曾祥华;;行政过程的社会正当性——利益平衡[J];安徽大学法律评论;2005年01期
2 张平;;法的核心要素之辩——以法律实证主义为中心[J];安徽大学法律评论;2010年02期
3 刘少军;叶雨晴;;关于相对不起诉中引进特别程序的法律思考——以被不起诉人的权利救济为视角[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年03期
4 聂小明;;高职学生法律思维方式培养探析[J];安徽电子信息职业技术学院学报;2007年05期
5 钟祖凤;;试论行政补偿的基本原则[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
6 段海峰;周梁云;;试析我国农村社会养老保险法律制度的构建——以云南为例[J];安徽农业科学;2008年30期
7 侯健;;言论自由及其限度[J];北大法律评论;2000年02期
8 程朝阳;;论法律的局限[J];北方法学;2008年04期
9 李文杰;;法律原则、自由裁量与良法价值理念的构建[J];北方法学;2010年06期
10 王妍;;商事登记在民商审判实践中的证据效力问题研究[J];北方法学;2010年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王天林;;公开被质疑的背后——对“邓玉娇事件”的宪政思考[A];第四届全国公法学博士生论坛论文集[C];2009年
2 郝建臻;;干部作风建设的法理学解读[A];北京教育纪检监察工作研究会2007年年会论文集[C];2008年
3 孙春晨;;经济伦理学研究中的三个理论论争[A];海峡两岸道德发展论[C];2008年
4 王庆华;;公共预算与分配正义[A];呼吁公共预算:来自政治学、公共行政学的声音——第一届中国公共预算研究全国学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
5 王晓;王s,
本文编号:2196894
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2196894.html