海口市保障性住房制度执行问题及对策研究

发布时间：2018-08-27 11:39

【摘要】：本文以海口市为例,研究其保障性住房制度执行问题。首先,笔者就国内外已有研究文献汇总整理,目前已有的文献成果集中在住房制度研究、保障性住房制度执行存在的问题及成员分析、保障性住房制度执行问题对策建议等,通过这些问题,奠定全文的理论基础;其次,笔者就目前海口市保障性住房制度细则进行深入阐释,包括廉租房、公共租赁房、限价房、经济适用房等四类房型的准入标准、申报流程、监管措施、退出机制、惩处措施等详细说明,此外,为更好执行保障性住房制度海口市也出台了相关措施及规定;最后,笔者采取深入访谈法、问卷调查法等形式,选取政府公职人员、承建商、住户三类人群为调查对象,设立满意度评价指标,就目前保障性住房制度执行状况进行打分。调查结果显示在问责机制执行是否到位、规划区域是否合理、资金是否充裕、物业管理及后续服务是否到位指标得分较低,问题比较严重。在信息披露是否齐全、动态监管是否严格周边配套是否齐全、准入制度执行是否严格、退出及上市交易制度是否合理、弄虚作假是否严重指标上得分处于刚好达标状况。仅有配套法律是否齐全、建设进度是否正常指标得分是较高的。同时,笔者也对部分指标得分较低成因做了分析并在最后针对这些问题提出了强化问责力度、开辟信息披露多个渠道、强化动态监管、拓宽资金渠道、限定居住年限及鼓励自觉退出、完善物业管理模式等建议。
[Abstract]:This paper takes Haikou City as an example to study the implementation of its indemnificatory housing system. First of all, the author summarized the existing research literature at home and abroad, the current literature focused on the research of housing system, the implementation of affordable housing system problems and members analysis, the implementation of affordable housing system countermeasures and suggestions, and so on. Through these problems, the theoretical basis of the full text is established. Secondly, the author gives an in-depth explanation of the current regulations of the indemnificatory housing system in Haikou City, including the admission standards of the four types of housing, such as low-rent housing, public rental housing, price-limited housing, comfortable housing, and so on. The declaration process, supervision measures, exit mechanism, punishment measures and so on are explained in detail. In addition, in order to better implement the indemnificatory housing system, Haikou City has also introduced relevant measures and regulations. Finally, the author has adopted in-depth interviews, questionnaires and other forms. Three groups of government officials, contractors and households were selected as the survey objects, and the satisfaction evaluation index was set up to score the implementation of the current affordable housing system. The results show that whether the accountability mechanism is in place, whether the planning area is reasonable, whether the funds are adequate, and whether the property management and follow-up services are in place have a lower score, and the problem is serious. Whether the information disclosure is complete, whether the dynamic supervision is strict, whether the peripheral matching is complete, whether the access system is strictly implemented, whether the exit and listing trading system is reasonable, and whether the score on the serious index of fraud is just up to the standard. Only complete supporting laws, construction progress is normal indicators score is high. At the same time, the author also makes an analysis of the causes of low scores of some indicators, and at the end of the paper puts forward to strengthen accountability, open up multiple channels of information disclosure, strengthen dynamic supervision, and broaden the channels of funds. Limit the number of years of residence and encourage voluntary withdrawal, improve the property management model and other suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.181

【相似文献】