技术中立与网络技术提供行为的刑法归责
发布时间：2018-09-17 12:03
【摘要】：技术中立是对网络技术提供行为进行刑法归责必须逾越的障碍,但刑法理论和司法实务难以提供圆满解释。网络技术提供行为符合可容许风险特征时属正当业务行为,排除犯罪成立;其超出社会所容许的程度才属于刑法的规制对象。刑法应平衡技术创新和法益保护二者的关系,限制网络技术提供者的刑事责任。只有当网络技术提供者对所提供技术具有实质控制力时,才负有客观作为义务,其主观犯意应根据"红旗规则"和"避风港规则"进行认定。
[Abstract]:Technology neutrality is the obstacle to criminal imputation of network technology providing behavior, but criminal law theory and judicial practice are difficult to provide satisfactory explanation. When the behavior of providing network technology conforms to the characteristics of allowable risk, it belongs to the legitimate business behavior and excludes the establishment of crime; it is beyond the allowable degree of society that it belongs to the regulatory object of criminal law. Criminal law should balance the relationship between technological innovation and legal interest protection and limit the criminal liability of network technology providers. Only when the network technology provider has substantial control over the technology provided, it has the obligation to act objectively, and its subjective criminal intention should be determined according to the red flag rules and the safe haven rules.
【作者单位】： 安徽大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科青年项目“治安违法行为犯罪化问题研究”(16CFX029)
【分类号】：D922.16;D924.3
本文编号：2245858
[Abstract]:Technology neutrality is the obstacle to criminal imputation of network technology providing behavior, but criminal law theory and judicial practice are difficult to provide satisfactory explanation. When the behavior of providing network technology conforms to the characteristics of allowable risk, it belongs to the legitimate business behavior and excludes the establishment of crime; it is beyond the allowable degree of society that it belongs to the regulatory object of criminal law. Criminal law should balance the relationship between technological innovation and legal interest protection and limit the criminal liability of network technology providers. Only when the network technology provider has substantial control over the technology provided, it has the obligation to act objectively, and its subjective criminal intention should be determined according to the red flag rules and the safe haven rules.
【作者单位】： 安徽大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科青年项目“治安违法行为犯罪化问题研究”(16CFX029)
【分类号】：D922.16;D924.3
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前1条
1 毛牧然;吴景滨;;论网络技术生态负向价值的技术与法律消解[A];第十届沈阳科学学术年会论文集（经济管理与人文科学分册）[C];2013年
，本文编号：2245858
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2245858.html
