当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

我国食品安全法律责任制度研究

发布时间:2019-01-01 20:50
【摘要】:“食”乃生命之本,是百姓生活中重要的组成部分之一。随着我国经济不断的发展,人们对食品安全问题的关注从满足温饱到注重安全,经历了艰难而复杂的过程。近年来,食品安全事件频发,食品安全问题成为人们当前生活中谈之色变的社会毒瘤,这其中不乏食品生产经营者的原因,但同时也反映了我国食品安全法律责任制度的薄弱。2009年实施的《中华人民共和国食品安全法》虽然对法律责任的规定较以往有所进步,但仍有不足之处,因此,有必要对我国食品安全法律责任制度进行系统地研究。 本文以“我国食品安全法律责任制度研究”为题,除导论和结论外,共分为四大部分。 第一部分为食品安全法律责任的基础理论。本部分先简要介绍食品安全法律责任的概念,比较辨析与其他法律责任的异同,进而分析食品安全法律责任的特征及分类。其次,详尽论述食品安全法律责任制度的原则。最后,梳理食品安全法律责任制度的补偿功能、惩罚功能和遏制功能以及公平、正义、秩序等价值。 第二部分主要研究国外食品安全法律责任制度。通过对美国、欧盟、日本的食品安全法律责任制度的比较分析,总结各自食品安全法律责任制度的特点,进而为完善我国食品安全法律责任制度提供可借鉴的经验和做法。 第三部分是对我国食品安全法律责任制度的反思。全面介绍我国食品安全法律责任的立法发展,并从市场主体、监管主体两个角度论述我国食品安全法律责任制度的立法现状,从而总结出我国食品安全法律责任制度存在的缺陷。 第四部分提出完善我国食品安全法律责任制度的构想。首先,从我国食品安全法律责任制度的立法理念、总体思路以及食品安全民事和刑事规制的重构三个方面提出我国食品安全法律责任制度的体系构想。其次,,对于市场主体分别从统一民事归责原则、完善惩罚性赔偿则制度、加大市场主体食品安全行政处罚力度、设立行政双罚制、完善行政责任与刑事责任的衔接机制、调整食品安全犯罪类别的归属、完善罚金刑、增加相关的资格刑等方面加以完善。最后,对于监管主体要扩大国家赔偿责任的范围、明确食品安全监管责任主体、扩展行政责任的实现形式、建立行政责任追究程序、完善食品监管渎职罪的条文设计、明确监管主体责任、将受贿罪与食品监管渎职罪数罪并罚。
[Abstract]:Food is the foundation of life and one of the important parts of people's life. With the development of Chinese economy, people have experienced a difficult and complicated process from satisfying food and clothing to paying attention to safety. In recent years, food safety incidents have occurred frequently, and food safety issues have become a social cancer that people talk about in their current lives, among which there are many reasons for food production and operators. However, it also reflects the weakness of the legal liability system for food safety in our country. Although the Food Safety Law of the people's Republic of China implemented in 2009, although the provisions on legal liability have made progress, but there are still some deficiencies, therefore, It is necessary to systematically study the legal liability system of food safety in China. This paper is entitled "study on the legal liability system of Food Safety in China", which is divided into four parts except the introduction and conclusion. The first part is the basic theory of food safety legal liability. This part first briefly introduces the concept of legal liability for food safety, compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between legal liability and other legal responsibilities, and then analyzes the characteristics and classification of legal liability for food safety. Secondly, the principle of food safety legal liability system is discussed in detail. Finally, the compensation function, punishment function and containment function of the legal liability system for food safety and the values of fairness, justice and order are combed. The second part mainly studies the foreign food safety legal liability system. Through the comparative analysis of the food safety legal liability system of the United States, the European Union and Japan, this paper summarizes the characteristics of their respective food safety legal liability systems, and then provides the experience and practice for the perfection of the food safety legal liability system in China. The third part is the reflection on the legal liability system of food safety in China. This paper introduces the legislative development of the legal responsibility for food safety in our country, and discusses the current legislative situation of the legal liability system of food safety in China from two angles: the main body of the market and the subject of supervision. The defects of the legal liability system of food safety in China are summarized. The fourth part puts forward the idea of perfecting the legal liability system of food safety in China. First of all, from the aspects of legislation concept, general idea and reconstruction of civil and criminal regulation of food safety, this paper puts forward the system conception of food safety legal liability system in China. Secondly, to the market subject from unifies the civil liability principle, consummates the punitive damages rule system, increases the market main body food safety administrative punishment dynamics, establishes the administrative double penalty system, consummates the administrative responsibility and the criminal responsibility connection mechanism, Adjust the classification of food safety crime, improve the fine penalty, increase the relevant qualification penalty and so on. Finally, the main body of supervision should expand the scope of national liability for compensation, clarify the main body of responsibility for food safety supervision, expand the form of administrative responsibility, establish the procedure of investigation of administrative responsibility, and perfect the design of the provisions of the crime of malfeasance in food supervision. Clear supervision of the main responsibility, bribery and food supervision dereliction of duty crime combined punishment.
【学位授予单位】:浙江财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王本宏;论惩罚性赔偿在合同领域的适用[J];安徽电力职工大学学报;2002年02期

2 刘雯,方晓阳;美国食品安全监管体系[J];安徽医药;2005年01期

3 浦川道太郎;;日本法上的惩罚性损害赔偿与制裁性慰谢金[J];法学家;2001年05期

4 邓成明;阳建勋;;无形损失、履行差错与十倍赔偿——对《食品安全法》第96条第2款的法经济分析[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2009年09期

5 梁昌全;;我国食品安全刑事立法的修改与完善[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年09期

6 胡启忠;;法律正义与法律价值之关系辨正[J];河北法学;2010年03期

7 王德章;吕金莲;;食品安全监管问题研究[J];黑龙江对外经贸;2009年07期

8 刘道远;;食品安全监管法律责任研究[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期

9 杜国明;;论《食品安全法》的民事责任制度[J];广西社会科学;2011年05期

10 艾尔肯;张榆;;论《食品安全法》中的惩罚性赔偿制度——兼评《食品安全法》第96条[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 刘畅;日本食品安全规制研究[D];吉林大学;2010年



本文编号:2398092

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2398092.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户95550***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com