“责令改正”的规范性研究
发布时间：2019-04-26 05:01
【摘要】：与"责令改正"类似的表述在各类规范性文件中大量出现,通过对相关规范性文件和案例的研究发现,"责令改正"存在概念、适用范围和法律属性的混乱,需要从理论和实践进行厘清。借用类型化方法和哈特法律规则范式,对"责令改正"进行理论分析,认为相关的表述应当统一为"责令改正",其法律性质应当认定为行政处罚,并尝试构建规范化的"责令改正"。
[Abstract]:A statement similar to "ordering correction" appears in large numbers in various normative documents. Through the study of relevant normative documents and cases, it is found that there is confusion in the concept, scope of application and legal attributes of "ordering correction". It needs to be clarified from theory and practice. With the help of typology and the paradigm of Hart's legal rules, this paper makes a theoretical analysis of "ordering correction", and holds that the relevant expressions should be unified as "ordering correction" and its legal nature should be regarded as an administrative punishment. And try to build a standardized "order correction".
【作者单位】： 中国人民公安大学法学院;
【基金】：2013年度司法部“法治建设与法学理论研究”课题:《精神病人实施的暴力案件中公安执法研究》(13SFB5020)研究成果
【分类号】：D922.1
，
本文编号：2465775
[Abstract]:A statement similar to "ordering correction" appears in large numbers in various normative documents. Through the study of relevant normative documents and cases, it is found that there is confusion in the concept, scope of application and legal attributes of "ordering correction". It needs to be clarified from theory and practice. With the help of typology and the paradigm of Hart's legal rules, this paper makes a theoretical analysis of "ordering correction", and holds that the relevant expressions should be unified as "ordering correction" and its legal nature should be regarded as an administrative punishment. And try to build a standardized "order correction".
【作者单位】： 中国人民公安大学法学院;
【基金】：2013年度司法部“法治建设与法学理论研究”课题:《精神病人实施的暴力案件中公安执法研究》(13SFB5020)研究成果
【分类号】：D922.1
，
本文编号：2465775
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2465775.html
