知识产权争议可仲裁性问题法律研究

发布时间：2018-03-14 04:36

本文选题：知识产权仲裁　切入点：可仲裁性　出处：《广东外语外贸大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在经济飞速发展和与国际接轨的今天,各种新型知识产权顺应而生,传统诉讼因周期长,费用高,专业性不强,保密性不好等缺点不再适合这种新型案件纠纷的解决,使得知识产权争端呈现多元化解决的趋势,知识产权仲裁以其自身的专业性,保密性,成本低,周期短,便于域外承认和执行,利于当事人日后合作等优点在多元化争端解决机制中脱颖而出。目前大部分国家均承认知识产权中有关合同性质和侵权性质的案件具有可仲裁性,但涉及知识产权有效性时,会因“公共政策”而拒绝承认其具有可仲裁性。深入剖析知识产权案件,尤其是涉及到有效性案件时可以看出,因仲裁裁决结果具有相对性,只对当事人产生约束力,故不足以造成“公共政策”中提及的危害国家利益等实质性后果,所以笔者认为知识产权案件均具有可仲裁性。本人对知识产权可仲裁性问题进行深入研究,通过辨析相关概念,明确争议问题,比较国外相关规定,从而得出知识产权纠纷具有可仲裁性的结论。从仲裁制度本身和非仲裁制度本身两个纬度去反思我国对知识产权纠纷解决机制的不足,再从上述两方面提出建议,进一步完善相关规定,尤其是有关仲裁机构与行政机关之间的衔接,从而保障知识产权仲裁的发展。本文主要分为四章。第一章对知识产权可仲裁性进行概述,首先将仲裁和可仲裁性的概念进行辨析,明确可仲裁性范围,其次介绍知识产权案件的特点,然后列举知识产权争议的主要类型,最后阐述知识产权可仲裁的理由。第二章是主要概括了就目前来说知识产权仲裁被限制的原因,一个是“公共政策”的庇护,另一个是知识产权仲裁本身的不足。第三章通过列举国外对知识产权可仲裁性的规定和实践,对比得出目前域外对知识产权仲裁的态度。第四章是结合我国现状,结合第二章和第三章的内容,从仲裁制度本身和非仲裁制度本身两个维度来给我国知识产权仲裁的发展提出具有针对性的建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy and the connection with the world, various new types of intellectual property rights come into being. Traditional litigation is no longer suitable for the settlement of this new type of case disputes because of its long period, high cost, low professionalism, poor confidentiality and so on. Intellectual property arbitration is characterized by its professionalism, confidentiality, low cost, short period, and convenient for extraterritorial recognition and enforcement. At present, most countries recognize the arbitrability of cases concerning the nature of contracts and infringement of intellectual property rights, but when it comes to the validity of intellectual property rights, A thorough analysis of intellectual property rights cases, especially when it comes to valid cases, shows that because of the relativity of the outcome of the arbitral award, it is binding only on the parties, Therefore, it is not enough to cause substantial consequences such as endangering the national interests mentioned in "public policy", so the author thinks that intellectual property rights cases are all arbitrable. I have made a thorough study on the arbitrability of intellectual property rights. By discriminating and analyzing the relevant concepts, clarifying the controversial issues, comparing the relevant provisions of foreign countries, From the two aspects of arbitration system and non-arbitration system itself to reflect on the shortcomings of the intellectual property dispute settlement mechanism in China, and then put forward suggestions from the above two aspects. To further improve the relevant provisions, especially the link between arbitration institutions and administrative agencies, so as to ensure the development of intellectual property arbitration. This paper is divided into four chapters. Chapter one summarizes the arbitrability of intellectual property. First of all, the concepts of arbitration and arbitrability are differentiated, the scope of arbitrability is clarified, the characteristics of intellectual property cases are introduced, and the main types of intellectual property disputes are listed. The second chapter mainly summarizes the reasons why intellectual property arbitration is restricted at present. One is the asylum of "public policy". The other is the deficiency of intellectual property arbitration itself. Chapter three compares the attitude of foreign countries on the arbitrability of intellectual property rights through enumerating the rules and practices of intellectual property arbitrability. Chapter 4th is based on the current situation in China. Combined with the content of the second and third chapters, the author puts forward some pertinent suggestions for the development of intellectual property arbitration in China from the two dimensions of arbitration system itself and non-arbitration system itself.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.7

【参考文献】