侵权法下纯粹经济损失救济制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-16 09:04

本文选题：纯粹经济损失 + 侵权法救济　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：近代民法是以权利为中心构建起的庞大体系，个人权利的保护便成为了侵权法所保护的焦点。但市民社会的复杂利益形态，已早不是物权、知识产权等领域可以完全覆盖。纯粹经济利益正是这复杂形态中的一类，本文的关注点便集中于纯粹经济损失的救济问题。本文分为五个部分，第一部分是纯粹经济损失的基础理论。主要阐述纯粹经济损失的概念、特征、主要类型。试图通过对基础理论的分析,以摆脱纯粹经济损失模糊不清的形象，并作出正确的定位。第二部分是对纯粹经济损失赔偿与否的既有因素分析。笔者将这分为两部分，首先立足于自由与安全这对价值矛盾体来看待纯粹经济损失的救济问题，其次从技术性角度上思考在法院与当事人之间的“诉讼闸门”、在行为人与受害人之间的预见性规则。此部分的分析为下文赔偿方案的提出奠定基础。第三部分是纯粹经济损失的救济制度的比较法考察。重点考察了法国法上的确定性损害与直接因果关系制度、德国法上独特的“三小段”规则、日本的不法性条款、以及英美法系特殊的判例救济制度。第四部分是对各国纯粹经济损失的救济制度进行的反思。我们发现主要存在三种救济道路，一种是以法、日为代表，执着于侵权责任的构成要件，通过对构成要件中的因果关系或违法性创新化运用来实现救济；一种为以德国为代表，执着于固有立法，通过对现有立法进行解释来进行救济；一种为以英美法系为代表，执着于判例中考量因素进行救济。第五部分是在我国侵权法下对纯粹经济损失救济制度进行重新分析。在相对宽松的救济环境下，通过积极适用因果关系等构成要件，吸收动态参考系的成果，使得纯粹经济损失能够在相对确定条件之下得到救济，既保证受害人的权益，，也保护行为人的自由。
[Abstract]:Modern civil law is a huge system centered on rights, and the protection of individual rights has become the focus of tort law.However, the complex interest form of civil society has long been not real right, intellectual property and other fields can be completely covered.Pure economic interest is just one of these complex forms. The focus of this paper is on the relief of pure economic loss.This paper is divided into five parts, the first part is the basic theory of pure economic loss.This paper mainly expounds the concept, characteristics and main types of pure economic loss.Through the analysis of basic theory, this paper tries to get rid of the vague image of pure economic loss and make a correct position.The second part is the analysis of the existing factors of compensation for pure economic losses.The author divides this into two parts. Firstly, based on the contradiction of value between freedom and security, the author views the relief problem of pure economic loss. Secondly, from the technical point of view, I think about the "action gate" between the court and the parties.Rules of predictability between the perpetrator and the victim.This part of the analysis for the following compensation scheme to lay the foundation.The third part is the comparative study of the relief system of pure economic loss.It focuses on the system of deterministic damage and direct causality in French law, the unique "three paragraphs" rule in German law, the illegality clause in Japan, and the special case relief system in Anglo-American law system.The fourth part is the reflection on the relief system of pure economic loss.We find that there are three main ways of relief: one is represented by law and day, which is persistent in the constitutive elements of tort liability, and the relief is realized by applying causality or illegal innovation in the constitutive elements; the other is represented by Germany.Persist in the inherent legislation, through the interpretation of the existing legislation to remedy; one is the Anglo-American law system as the representative, persistent in the case of considerations to remedy.The fifth part reanalyzes the relief system of pure economic loss under the tort law of our country.In the relatively loose relief environment, by actively applying the constitutive elements such as causality and absorbing the achievements of the dynamic reference system, the pure economic loss can be remedied under relatively certain conditions, which ensures the rights and interests of the victims.The freedom of the perpetrator is also protected.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】